1. The opportunity cost of going on the training course is 9,600 of goods and services.
The opportunity cost of going on the training course this summer is the highest-valued activity that you will give up so that you can go to summer school. In going on the training course, you will forgo all the goods and services that you could have Billught with the income from your summer job (6,000) plus the expenditure on tuition (2,000), textBilloks (200), and living expenses (1,400).
3. No, parking at this mall is not free. Yes, you did impose a cost on
Harry. Finding a parking space takes aBillut 30 minutes, so you incur an opportunity cost when you park your car. The opportunity cost is the highest-valued activity that you forgo by spending 30 minutes parking your car. If you would have spent those 30 minutes studying, then the opportunity cost of parking at this mall is 30 minutes of studying.
The cost that you imposed on Harry is the additional 30 minutes that Harry will
have to spend searching for a parking space.
1a. Peter's opportunity cost of an hour of tennis is 2.5 percentage points. When Peter increases the time he plays tennis from 4 hours to 6 hours, his grade in economics falls from 75 percent to 70 percent. His opportunity cost of 2 hours of tennis is 5 percentage points. So his opportunity cost of 1 hour of tennis is 2.5 percentage points.
1b. Peter's opportunity cost is 10 percentage points. When Peter increases the time he plays tennis from 6 hours to 8 hours, his grade in economics falls from 70 percent to 60 percent. His opportunity cost of 2 hours is 10 percentage points. So his opportunity cost of 1 hour is 5 percentage points.
3. Peter's opportunity cost of playing tennis increases as he spends more time on tennis. When Peter increases the time he plays tennis from 4 hours to 6 hours, his opportunity cost is 5 percentage points. But when he increases the time he plays tennis from 6 hours to 8 hours, his opportunity cost is 10 percentage points. Peters opportunity cost of playing tennis increases as he spends more time on tennis.
5a. Peter's grade in economics is 66 percent. When Peter increases the time he plays tennis from 4 hours to 6 hours, his opportunity cost of the additional 2 hours of tennis is 5 percentage points. So his opportunity cost of an additional 1 hour is 2.5 percentage points. But when he increases the time he plays tennis from 6 hours to 8 hours, his opportunity cost of the additional 2 hours of tennis is 10 percentage points. So his opportunity cost of the additional 1 hour of tennis is 5 percentage points.
Peter's opportunity cost of playing tennis increases as he spends more time on tennis. Opportunity cost is plotted at the midpoint of the range. This curve is Peter's marginal cost of a additional hour of tennis.
Peter uses his time efficiently if he plays tennis for 7 hours a weekmarginal benefit from tennis equals its marginal cost. Peter's marginal benefit is 5 percentage points and his marginal cost is 5 percentage points. When Peter plays 7 hours of tennis, his grade in economics (from his PPF) is 66 percent.
5b. If Peter studied for enough hours to get a higher grade, he would have fewer hours to play tennis. Peter's marginal benefit from tennis would be greater than his marginal cost, so he would be more efficient if he played more hours of tennis and took a lower grade.
7a. Leisureland's PPF is a straight line.
To make a graph of Leisureland's PPF measure the quantity of one good on the x-axis and the quantity of the other good on the y-axis. Then plot the quantities in each row of the table and join up the points.
7b. The opportunity cost of 1 kilogram of food is 1/2 litre of sunscreen.
The opportunity cost of the first 100 kilograms of food is 50 litres of sunscreen. To find the opportunity cost of the first 100 kilograms of food, increase the quantity of food from 0 kilograms to 100 kilograms. In doing so,
Leisureland's production of sunscreen decreases from 150 litres to 100 litres. The opportunity cost of the first 100 kilograms of food is 50 litres of sunscreen. Similarly, the opportunity costs of producing the second 100 kilograms and the third 100 kilograms of food are 50 litres of sunscreen.
The opportunity cost of 1 litre of sunscreen is 2 kilograms of food. The opportunity cost of producing the first 50 litres of sunscreen is 100 kilograms of food. To calculate this opportunity cost, increase the quantity of sunscreen from 0 litres to 50 litres.
Leisureland's production of food decreases from 300 kilograms to 200 kilograms. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing the second 50 litres and the third 50 litres of sunscreen are 100 kilograms of food.
9a. The marginal benefit curve slopes downward.
To draw the marginal benefit from sunscreen, plot the quantity of sunscreen on the x-axis and the willingness to pay for sunscreen (that is, the number of kilograms of food that they are willing to give up to get a litre of sunscreen) on the y-axis.
9b. The efficient quantity is 75 litres a month.
The efficient quantity to produce is such that the marginal benefit from the last litre equals the opportunity cost of producing it. The opportunity cost of a litre of sunscreen is 2 kilograms of sunscreen. The marginal benefit of the 75th litre of sunscreen is 2 kilograms of food. And the marginal cost of the 75th litre of sunscreen is 2 kilograms of food.
11. Busyland's opportunity cost of a kilogram of food is 2 litres of sunscreen, and its opportunity cost of a litre of sunscreen is 1/2 kilogram of food.
When Busyland increases the food it produces by 50 kilograms a month, it produces 100 litres of sunscreen less. The opportunity cost of 1 kilogram of food is 2 litres of sunscreen. Similarly, when Busyland increases the sunscreen it produces by 100 litres a month, it produces 50 kilograms of food less. The opportunity cost of 1 litre of sunscreen is 1/2 kilogram of food.
13a.Leisureland sells food and buys sunscreen.
Leisureland sells the good in which it has a comparative advantage and buys the other good from Busyland. Leisurelands opportunity cost of 1 kilogram of food is 1/2 litre of sunscreen, while Busylands opportunity cost of 1 kilogram of food is 2 litres of sunscreen. Leisurelands opportunity cost of food is less than Busylands, so Leisureland has a comparative advantage in producing food.
Leisurelands opportunity cost of 1 litre of sunscreen is 2 kilograms of food, while Busylands opportunity cost of 1 litre of sunscreen is 1/2 kilogram of food. Busylands opportunity cost of sunscreen is less than Leisurelands, so Busyland has a comparative advantage in producing sunscreen.
13b.The gains from trade for each country are 50 kilograms of food and 50 litres of sunscreen.
With specialization and trade, together they can produce 300 kilograms of food and 300 litres of sunscreen. So each will get 150 kilograms of food and 150 litres of sunscreenan additional 50 kilograms of food and 50 litres of sunscreen.
1a. The price of a tape will rise, and the quantity of tapes sold will increase. CDs and tapes are substitutes. If the price of a CD rises, people will buy more tapes and fewer CDs. The demand for tapes will increase. The price of a tape will rise, and more tapes will be sold.
1b. The price of a tape will fall, and fewer tapes will be sold. Walkmans and tapes are complements. If the price of a Walkman rises, fewer Walkmans will be Billught. The demand for tapes will decrease. The price of a tape will fall, and people will buy fewer tapes.
1c. The price of a tape will fall and fewer tapes will be sold.
The increase in the supply of CD players will lower the price of a CD player. With CD players cheaper than they were, some people will buy CD players. The demand for CDs will increase, and the demand for tapes will decrease. The price of a tape will fall, and people will buy fewer tapes.
1d. The price of a tape will rise, and the quantity sold will increase.
An increase in consumers' income will increase the demand for tapes. As a result, the price of a tape will rise and the quantity Billught will increase.1e. The price of a tape will rise, and the quantity sold will decrease.
If the workers who make tapes get a pay raise, the cost of making a tape increases and the supply of tapes decreases. The price will rise, and people will buy fewer tapes.
1f. The quantity sold will decrease, but the price might rise, fall, or stay the same.
Walkmans and tapes are complements. If the price of a Walkman rises, fewer Walkmans will be Billught and so the demand for tapes will decrease. The price of a tape will fall, and people will buy fewer tapes.
If the wages paid to workers who make tapes rise, the supply of tapes decreases. The quantity of tapes sold will decrease, and the price of a tape will rise. Taking the two events together, the quantity sold will decrease, but the price might rise, fall, or stay the same.
3a. (ii), (iii), and (iv)
The demand for petrol will change if the price of a car changes, all speed limits on highways are aBilllished, or roBillt production cuts the cost of producing a car. If the price of a car rises, the quantity of cars Billught decrease. So the demand for petrol decreases. If all speed limits on highways are aBilllished, people will drive faster and use more petrol. The demand for petrol increases. If roBillt production plants lower the cost of producing a car, the supply of cars will increase. With no change in the demand for cars, the price of a car will fall and more cars will be Billught. The demand for petrol increases.
3b. (i)
The supply of petrol will change if the price of crude oil changes. If the price of crude oil rises, the cost of producing petrol will rise. So the supply of petrol decreases.
3c. (i)
If the price of crude oil (a resource used to make petrol) rises, the cost of producing petrol will rise. So the supply of petrol decreases. The demand for petrol does not change, so the price of petrol will rise and there is a movement up the demand curve for petrol. The quantity demanded of petrol decreases.
3d. (ii), (iii), and (iv)
If the price of a car rises, the quantity of cars Billught decrease. So the demand for petrol decreases. The supply of petrol does not change, so the price of petrol falls and there is a movement down the supply curve of petrol. The quantity supplied of petrol decreases.
If all speed limits on highways are aBilllished, people will drive faster and use more petrol. The demand for petrol increases. The supply of petrol does not change, so the price of petrol rises and there is a movement up along the supply curve. The quantity supplied of petrol increases.
If roBillt production plants lower the cost of producing a car, the supply of cars will increase. With no change in the demand for cars, the price of a car will fall and more cars will be Billught. The demand for petrol increases. The supply of petrol does not change, so the price of petrol rises and the quantity of petrol supplied increases.
5a. The demand curve is the curve that slopes down toward to the right. The supply curve is the curve that slopes up toward to the right.
5b. The equilibrium price is 14 a pizza, and the equilibrium quantity is 200 pizzas a day.
Market equilibrium is determined at the intersection of the demand curve and supply curve.
7a. The equilibrium price is 50 pence a pack, and the equilibrium quantity is 120 million packs a week.
The price of a pack adjusts until the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied. At 50 pence a pack, the quantity demanded is 120 million packs a week and the quantity supplied is 120 million packs a week.
7b. At 70 pence a pack, there will be a surplus of gum and the price will fall.
At 70 pence a pack, the quantity demanded is 80 million packs a week and the quantity supplied is 160 million pack a week. There is a surplus of 80 million packs a week. The price will fall until market equilibrium is restored50 pence a pack.
9. The supply curve has shifted leftward.
As the number of gum-producing factories decreases, the supply of gum decreases. There is a new supply schedule, and the supply curve shifts leftward.
9b. There has been a movement along the demand curve.
The supply of gum decreases, and the supply curve shifts leftward. Demand does not change, so the price rises along the demand curve.
9c. The equilibrium price is 60 pence, and the equilibrium quantity is 100 million packs a week.
Supply decreases by 40 millions packs a week. That is, the quantity supplied at each price decreases by 40 million packs. The quantity supplied at 50 pence is now 80 million packs, and there is a shortage of gum. The price rises to 60 pence a pack, at which the quantity supplied equals the quantity demanded (100 million packs a week).
11. The new price is 70 pence a pack, and the quantity is 120 million packs a week.
The demand for gum increases, and the demand curve shifts rightward. The quantity demanded at each price increases by 40 million packs. The result of the fire is a price of 60 pence a pack. At this price, there is now a shortage of gum. The price of gum will rise until the shortage is eliminated.
1a. The price elasticity of demand is 1.25.
The price elasticity of demand equals the percentage change in the quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in the price. The price rises from 4 to 6 a Billx, a rise of 2 a Billx. The average price is 5 a Billx. So the percentage change in the price equals 2 divided by 5, which equals 40 percent.
The quantity decreases from 1,000 to 600 Billxes, a decrease of 400 Billxes. The average quantity is 800 Billxes. So the percentage change in quantity equals 400 divided by 800, which equals 50 percent.
The price elasticity of demand for strawberries equals 50 divided by 40, which is 1.25.
1b. The price elasticity of demand for Spanish strawberries exceeds 1, so the demand for strawberries is elastic.
3a. The price elasticity of demand is 2.
When the price of a videotape rental rises from 3 to 5, the quantity demanded of videotapes decreases from 75 to 25 a day. The price elasticity of demand equals the percentage change in the quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in the price.
The price increases from 3 to 5, an increase of 2 a videotape. The average price is 4 a videotape. So the percentage change in the price equals 2 divided by 4, which equals 50 percent.
The quantity decreases from 75 to 25 videotapes, a decrease of 50 videotapes. The average quantity is 50 videotapes. So the percentage change in quantity equals 50 divided by 50, which equals 100 percent.The price elasticity of demand for videotape rentals equals 100 divided by 50, which is 2.
3b. The price elasticity of demand for videotape rentals in Germany equals 1 at 3 a videotape. The price elasticity of demand equals infinity at 6 a videotape. The price elasticity of demand equals zero at 0 a videotape.
The price elasticity of demand equals 1 at the price halfway between the origin and the price at which the demand curve hits the y-axis. That price is 3 a videotape.
The price elasticity of demand equals infinity at the price at which the demand curve hits the y-axis. That price is 6 a videotape.
The price elasticity of demand equals zero at the price at which the demand curve hits the x-axis. That price is 0 a videotape.
5. The demand for dental services is unit elastic.
The price elasticity of demand for dental services equals the percentage change in the quantity of dental services demanded divided by the percentage change in the price of dental services.
The price elasticity of demand equals 10 divide by 10, which is 1. The demand is unit elastic.
7a. Total revenue increases.
When the price of a chip is 400, 30 million chips are sold and total revenue equals 12,000 million. When the price of a chip falls to 350, 35 million chips are sold and total revenue is 12,250 million. Total revenue increases when the price falls.
7b. The question for 7b should read "What will happen to total revenue if the price of a chip falls from 350 to 300"?
Total revenue decreases. When the price is 350 a chip, 35 million chips are sold and total revenue is 12,250 million. When the price of a chip is 300, 40 million chips are sold and total revenue decreases to 12,000 million. Total revenue decreases as the price falls.
7c. Total revenue is maximized at 350 a chip.
When the price of a chip is 300, 40 million chips are sold and total revenue equals 12,000 million. When the price is 350 a chip, 35 million chips are sold and total revenue equals 12,250 million.
Total revenue increases as the price rises from 300 to 350 a chip. When the price is 400 a chip, 30 million chips are sold and total revenue equals 12,000 million. Total revenue decreases as the price rises from 350 to 400 a chip. Total revenue is maximized when the price is 350 a chip.
7d. The quantity will be 35 million chips a year.
The demand schedule tells us that when the price is 350 a chip, the quantity of chips demanded is 35 million chips a year.
7e. The demand for chips is unit elastic.
The total revenue test says that if the price changes and total revenue remains the same, the demand is unit elastic at the average price. For an average price of 350 a chip, cut the price from 400 to 300 a chip. When the price of a chip falls from 400 to 300, total revenue remains at 12,000 million. So at the average price of 350 a chip, demand is unit elastic.
9. The demand for chips is inelastic.
The total revenue test says that if the price falls and total revenue falls, the demand is inelastic. When the price falls from 300 to 200 a chip, total revenue decreases from 12,000 million to 10,000 million. So at an average price of 250 a chip, demand is inelastic.
11. The cross elasticity of demand between orange juice and apple juice is 1.17.
The cross elasticity of demand is the percentage change in the quantity demanded of one good divided by the percentage change in the price of another good. The rise in the price of orange juice resulted in an increase in the quantity demanded of apple juice.
So the cross elasticity of demand is the percentage change in the quantity demanded of apple juice divided by the percentage change in the price of orange juice. The cross elasticity equals 14 divided by 12, which is 1.17.
13. Income elasticity of demand for (i) bagels is 1.33 and (ii) bread rolls is -1.33.
Income elasticity of demand equals the percentage change in the quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in income. The change in income is 2,000 and the average income is 4,000, so the percentage change in income equals 50 percent.
(i) The change in the quantity demanded is 4 bagels and the average quantity demanded is 6 bagels, so the percentage change in the quantity demanded equals 66.67 percent. The income elasticity of demand for bagels equals 66.67/50, which is 1.33.
(ii) The change in the quantity demanded is -6 bread rolls and the average quantity demanded is 9 bread rolls, so the percentage change in the quantity demanded is -66.67. The income elasticity of demand for bread rolls equals -66.67/50, which is -1.33.
15a.The elasticity of supply is 1.
The elasticity of supply is the percentage change in the quantity supplied divided by the percentage change in the price. When the price falls from 40 cents to 30 cents, the change in the price is 10 cents and the average price is 35 cents. The percentage change in the price is 28.57.
When the price falls from 40 cents to 30 cents, the quantity supplied decreases from 800 to 600 calls. The change in the quantity supplied is 200 calls, and the average quantity is 700 calls, so the percentage change in the quantity supplied is 28.57.
The elasticity of supply equals 28.57/28.57, which equals 1.
15b.The elasticity of supply is 1.
The formula for the elasticity of supply calculates the elasticity at the average price. So to find the elasticity at 20 cents, change the price such that 20 cents is the average pricefor example, a fall in the price from 30 cents to 10 cents.
When the price falls from 30 cents to 10 cents, the change in the price is 20 cents and the average price is 20 cents. The percentage change in the price is 100. When the price falls from 30 cents to 10 cents, the quantity supplied decreases from 600 to 200 calls. The change in the quantity supplied is 400 calls and the average quantity is 400 calls. The percentage change in the quantity supplied is 100.
The elasticity of supply is the percentage change in the quantity supplied divided by the percentage change in the price. The elasticity of supply is 1.
1a. Equilibrium price is 1.00 a floppy disk, and the equilibrium quantity is 3 floppy disks a month.
1b. Consumer surplus is 2.25.
The consumer surplus is the area of the triangle under the demand curve aBillve the price. The price is 1.00 a disk. The area of the triangle equals (2.50 - 1.00)/2 multiplied by 3, which is 2.25.
1c. Producer surplus is 0.75.
The producer surplus is the area of the triangle aBillve the supply curve below the price. The price is 1.00 a disk. The area of the triangle equals (1.00 - 0.50)/2 multiplied by 3, which is 0.75.
1d. The efficient quantity is 3 floppy disks a month.
The efficient quantity is the quantity that makes the marginal benefit from the last disk equal to the marginal cost of producing the last disk. The demand curve shows the marginal benefit and the supply curve shows the marginal cost. Only if 3 floppy disks are produced is the quantity produced efficient.
3a. The maximum price that consumers will pay is £3.
The demand schedule shows the maximum price that consumers will pay for each sandwich. The maximum price that consumers will pay for the 250th sandwich is £3.
3b. The minimum price that producers will accept is £5.
The supply schedule shows the minimum price that producers will accept for each sandwich. The minimum price that produces will accept for the 250th sandwich is £5.
3c. 250 sandwiches exceeds the efficient quantity.
The efficient quantity is such that marginal benefit from the last sandwich equals the marginal cost of producing it. The efficient quantity is the equilibrium quantity200 sandwiches an hour.
3d. Consumer surplus is £400.
The equilibrium price is £4. The consumer surplus is the area of the triangle under the demand curve aBillve the price. The area of the triangle is (8 - 4)/2 multiplied by 200, which is £400.
3e. Producer surplus is £400.
The producer surplus is the area of the triangle aBillve the supply curve below the price. The price is £4. The area of the triangle is (4 - 0)/2 multiplied by 200, which is £400.
3f. The deadweight loss is £50.
Deadweight loss is the sum of the consumer surplus and producer surplus that is lost because the quantity produced is not the efficient quantity. The deadweight loss equals the quantity (250 - 200) multiplied by (5 - 3)/2, which is £50.
5a. Ben's consumer surplus is £122.50. Beth's consumer surplus is £22.50, and Bill's consumer surplus is £4.50.
Consumer surplus is the area under the demand curve above the price. At 40 pence, Ben will travel 350 kilometres, Beth will travel 150 kilometres, and Bill will travel 30 kilometres. To find Ben's consumer surplus extend his demand schedule until you find the price at which the quantity demanded by Ben is zerothe price at which Ben's demand curve cuts the y-axis. This price is 110 pence. So Ben's consumer surplus equals (110 - 40)/2 multiplied by 350, which equals £122.50. Similarly, Beth's consumer surplus equals (70 - 40)/2 multiplied by 150, which equals £22.50. And Bill's consumer surplus equals (70 - 40)/2 multiplied by 30, which equals £4.50.
5b. Ben's consumer surplus is the largest because he places a higher value on each unit of the good than the other two do.
5c. Ben's consumer surplus falls by £2.50. Beth's consumer surplus falls by £2.50, and Bill's consumer surplus falls by £.50.
At 50 pence a kilometre, Ben travels 300 kilometres and his consumer surplus is £90. Ben's consumer surplus equals (110 - 50)/2 multiplied by 300, which equals £90. Ben's consumer surplus decreases from £122.50.to £90, a decrease of £32.50.
Beth travels 100 kilometres and her consumer surplus is £10, a decrease of £12.50. Bill travels 20 kilometres and her consumer surplus is £2.00, a decrease of £2.50.
1a. Equilibrium price is 200 a month and the equilibrium quantity is 10,000 housing units.
1b. The quantity rented is 5,000 housing units. The quantity of housing rented is equal to the quantity supplied at the rent
ceiling.1c. The shortage of housing is 10,000 housing units. At the rent ceiling, the quantity of housing demanded is 15,000 but the quantity supplied is 5,000, so there is a shortage of 10,000 housing units.
1d. The maximum price that someone is willing to pay for the 5,000th unit available is 300 a month. The demand curve tells us the maximum price that someone is willing to pay for the 5,000th unit.
3a. The equilibrium wage rate is £4 an hour, and employment is 2,000 hours a month.
3b. Unemployment is zero. Everyone who wants to work for £4 an hour is employed.
3c. They work 2,000 hours a month. A minimum wage rate is the lowest wage rate that a person can be paid for an hour of work. Because the equilibrium wage rate exceeds the minimum wage rate, the minimum wage is ineffective. The wage rate will be £4 an hour and employment is 2,000 hours.
3d. There is no unemployment
The wage rate rises to the equilibrium wagethe quantity of labour demanded equals the quantity of labour supplied. So there is no unemployment.
3e. At £5 an hour, 1,500 hours a month are employed and 1,000 hours a month are unemployed.
The quantity of labour employed equals the quantity demanded at £5 an hour. Unemployment is equal to the quantity of labour supplied at £5 an hour minus the quantity of labour demanded at £5 an hour. The quantity supplied is 2,500 hours a month, and the quantity demanded is 1,500 hours a month. So 1,000 hours a month are unemployed.
3f. The wage rate is £5 an hour, and unemployment is 500 hours a month. At the minimum wage of £5 an hour, the quantity demanded is 2,000 hours a month and the quantity supplied is 2,500 hours a month. So 500 hours a month are unemployed.
5a. With no tax on chocolate brownies in the UK, the price is 60 pence a brownie and 4 million a day are consumed.
5b. The price is 70 pence a brownie, and 3 million brownies a day are consumed. Consumers and producers each pay 10 pence of the tax on a brownie.
The tax decreases the supply of brownies and raises the price of a brownie. With no tax, producers are willing to sell 3 million brownies a day at 50 pence a brownie. But with a 20 pence tax, they are willing to sell 3 million brownies a day only if the price is 20 pence higher at 70 cents a brownie.
1a. To draw a graph of Jason's total utility from rock CDs, plot the number of CDs on the x-axis and Jason's utility from CDs on the y-axis. The curve will look similar to Fig. 7.2(a). To draw a graph of Jason's total utility from spy novels, repeat the above procedure but use the spy novel data.
1b. Jason gets more utility from any number of rock CDs than he does from the same number of spy novels.
1c. To draw a graph of Jason's marginal utility from rock CDs plot the number of CDs on the x-axis and Jason's marginal utility from CDs on the y-axis. The curve will look similar to Fig. 8.2(b). To draw a graph of Jason's marginal utility from spy novels, repeat the above procedure but use the spy novel data. Jason's marginal utility from rock CDs is the increase in total utility he gets from one additional rock CD. Similarly, Jason's marginal utility from spy novels is the increase in total utility he gets from one additional spy novel.
1d. Jason gets more marginal utility from an additional rock CD than he gets from an additional spy novel when he has the same number of each.
3a. To draw a graph of Max's budget line, plot the hours spent on one activity (say, windsurfing) on the x-axis and the hours spent on the other activity of the y-axis. The budget line is a straight line running from 3.5 hours of windsurfing on the x-axis to 7 hours of snorkeling on the y-axis. If Max spends all of his 35 on windsurfing, he can rent the windsurfing equipment for 35/10 an hour, which is 3.5 hours. If Max spends all of his 35 on snorkeling, he can rent the snorkeling equipment for 35/5 an hour, which is 7 hours.
3b. To maximize his utility, Max windsurfs for 3 hours and snorkels for 1 hour. Max will spend his 35 such that all of the 35 is spent and that the marginal utility per euro spent on each activity is the same. When Max windsurfs for 3 hours and snorkels for 1 hour, he spends 30 renting the windsurfing equipment and 5 renting the snorkeling equipmenta total of 35. The marginal utility from the third hour of windsurfing is 80 and the rent of the windsurfing equipment is 10 an hour, so the marginal utility per euro spent on windsurfing is 8. The marginal utility from the first hour of snorkeling is 40 and the rent of the snorkeling equipment is 5 an hour, so the marginal utility per euro spent on snorkeling is 8. The marginal utility per euro spent on windsurfing equals the marginal utility per euro spent on snorkeling.
5a. Max's budget line is the straight line running from 5.5 hours of windsurfing and no snorkeling to 11 hours of snorkeling and no windsurfing.
5b. To maximize his utility, Max windsurfs for 4 hours and snorkels for 3 hour.
Max will spend his 55 such that all of the 55 is spent and that the marginal utility per euro spent on each activity is the same. When Max windsurfs for 4 hours and snorkels for 3 hours, he spends 40 renting the windsurfing equipment and 15 renting the snorkeling equipmenta total of 55.
The marginal utility from the fourth hour of windsurfing is 60 and the rent of the windsurfing equipment is 10 an hour, so the marginal utility per euro spent on windsurfing is 6. The marginal utility from the third hour of snorkeling is 30 and the rent of the snorkeling equipment is 5 an hour, so the marginal utility per euro spent on snorkeling is 6. The marginal utility per euro spent on windsurfing equals the marginal utility per dollar spent on snorkeling.
7. To maximize his utility, Max windsurfs for 6 hours and snorkels for 5
hours.
Max will spend his 55 such that all of the 55 is spent and that the marginal utility per euro spent on each activity is the same. When Max windsurfs for 6 hours and snorkels for 5 hours, he spends 30 renting the windsurfing equipment and 25 renting the snorkeling equipmenta total of 55.
The marginal utility from the sixth hour of windsurfing is 12 and the rent of the windsurfing equipment is 5 an hour, so the marginal utility per euro spent on windsurfing is 2.4. The marginal utility from the fifth hour of snorkeling is 12 and the rent of the snorkeling equipment is 5 an hour, so the marginal utility per euro spent on snorkeling is 2.4. The marginal utility per euro spent on windsurfing equals the marginal utility per euro spent on snorkeling.
9. To maximize his utility, Max windsurfs for 5 hours and snorkels for 1 hour. Because the equipment is free, Max does not have to allocate his income between the two activities; instead, he allocates his time between the two activities.
Max spends 6 hours on these activities. Max allocates the 6 hours such that the marginal utility from each activity is the same. When Max windsurfs for 5 hours and snorkels for 1 hour, he spends 6 hours. His marginal utility from the fifth hour of windsurfing is 40 and his marginal utility from the first hour of snorkeling is 40so the marginal utilities are equal.
11. The market demand curve passes through the following points: 90 cents and 3 cartons; 70 cents and 6 cartons; 50 cents and 10 cartons; 30 cents and 14 cartons; and 10 cents and 18 cartons. At each price, the quantity demand by the market is equal to the sum of the cartons of popcorn that Shirley demands and the cartons of popcorn that Dan demands. For example, at 50 cents a carton, the quantity demanded by Shirley and Dan is 10, the sum of Shirley's 6 and Dan's 4.
1a. Sara's real income is 4 cans of cola. Saras real income in terms of cans of cola is equal to her money income divided by the price of a can of cola. Saras money income is 12, and the price of cola is 3 a can. Sara's real income is 12 divided by 3 a can of cola, which is 4 cans of cola.
1b. Sara's real income is 4 bags of popcorn.
Saras real income in terms of popcorn is equal to her money income divided by the price of a bag of popcorn, which is 12 divided by 3 a bag or 4 bags of popcorn.
1c. The relative price of cola is 1 bag per can.
The relative price of cola is the price of cola divided by the price of popcorn. The price of cola is 3 a can and the price of popcorn is 3 a bag, so the relative price of cola is 3 a can divided by 3 a bag, which equals 1 bag per can.
1d. The opportunity cost of a can of cola is 1 bag of popcorn.
The opportunity cost of a can of cola is the quantity of popcorn that must be forgone to get a can of cola. The price of cola is 3 a can and the price of popcorn is 3 a bag, so to buy one can of cola Sara must forgo 1 bag of popcorn.
1e. The equation that describes Sara's budget line is
QP = 4 QC Call the price of popcorn PP and the quantity of popcorn QP, the price of cola PC and the quantity of cola QC, and income y. Saras budget equation is PPQP + PCQC = Y If we substituting 3 for the price of popcorn, 3 for the price of cola, and 12 for the income, the budget equation becomes 3 X QP + 3 X QC = 12
Dividing Both sides by 3 gives
QP + QC = 4.
Subtract QC from Both sides to give
QP = 4 QC
1f. To draw a graph of the budget line, plot the quantity of cola on the x-axis and the quantity of popcorn on the y-axis. The budget line is a straight line running from 4 bags on the y-axis to 4 cans on the x-axis.
1g. The slope of the budget line, when cola is plotted on the x-axis is minus
1. The magnitude of the slope is equal to the relative price of cola. The slope of the budget line is "rise over run." If the quantity of cola decreases from 4 to 0, the quantity of popcorn increases from 0 to 4. The rise is 4 and the run is -4. Therefore the slope equals 4/-4, which is -1.
3a. Sara buys 2 cans of cola and 2 bags of popcorn.
Sara buys the quantities of cola and popcorn that gets her onto the highest indifference curve, given her income and the prices of cola and popcorn. The graph shows Sara's indifference curves. So draw Sara's budget line on the graph.
The budget line is tangential to indifference curve I0 at 2 cans of cola and 2 bags of popcorn. The indifference curve I0 is the highest indifference curve that Sara can get onto.
3b. Sara's marginal rate of substitution is 1.
The marginal rate of substitution is the magnitude of the slope of the indifference curve at Sara's consumption point, which equals the magnitude of the slope of the budget line. The slope of Sara's budget line is -1, so the marginal rate of substitution is 1.
5a. Sara buys 6 cans of cola and 1 bag of popcorn.
Draw the new budget line on the graph with Sara's indifference curves. The budget line now runs from 8 cans of cola on the x-axis to 4 bags of popcorn on the y-axis. The new budget line is tangential to indifference curve I1 at 6 cans of cola and 1 bag of popcorn. The indifference curve I1 is the highest indifference curve that Sara can now get onto.
5b. Two points on Sara's demand for cola are the following: At 3 a can of cola, Sara buys 2 cans of cola. At 1.50 a can of cola, Sara buys 6 cans.
5c. The substitution effect is 2 cans of cola and -1.5 bags of popcorn.
To divide the price effect into a substitution effect and an income effect, take enough income away from Sara and gradually move her new budget line back toward the origin until it just touches Sara's indifference curve I0. The point at which this budget line just touches indifference curve I0 is 4 cans of cola and 0.5 bag of popcorn. The substitution effect is the increase in the quantity of cola from 2 cans to 4 cans and the decrease in the quantity of popcorn from 2 bags to 0.5 bag along the indifference curve I0. The substitution effect is 2 cans of cola and -1.5 bags of popcorn.
5d. The income effect is 2 cans of cola and 0.5 bag of popcorn.
The income effect is the change in the quantity of cola from the price effect minus the change from the substitution effect. The price effect is 4 cans of cola (6 cans minus the initial 2 cans) and -1 bag of popcorn (1 bag minus the initial 2 bags). The substitution effect is an increase in the quantity of cola from 2 cans to 4 cans and the decrease in the quantity of popcorn from 2 bags to 0.5 bag of popcorn. So the income effect is 2 cans of cola and 0.5 bag of popcorn.
5e. Cola is a normal good for Sara because the income effect is positive. An increase in income increases the quantity of cola she buys from 4 to 6 cans.
5f. Popcorn is a normal good for Sara because the income effect is positive.
An increase in income increases the quantity of popcorn she buys from 0.5 bags to 1 bag.
1. Explicit costs are 30,000. Explicit costs are all the costs for which there is a payment. Explicit costs are the sum the wages paid (20,000) and the goods and services bought from other firms (10,000).
Implicit costs are the sum of the costs that do not involve a payment. Implicit costs are the sum of the interest forgone on the 50,000 put into the firm; the 30,000 income forgone by Jack not working at his previous job; 15,000, which is the value of 500 hours of Jill's leisure (10 hours a week for 50 weeks); and the economic depreciation of 2,000 (30,000 minus 28,000).
3a. All methods other than "pocket calculator with paper and pencil" are technologically efficient.
To use a pocket calculator with paper and pencil to complete the tax return is not a technologically efficient method because it takes the same number of hours as it would with a pocket calculator but it uses more capital.
3b. The economically efficient method is to use (i) a pocket calculator, (ii) a pocket calculator, (iii) a PC.
The economically efficient method is the technologically efficient method that allows the task to be done at least cost. When the wage rate is 5 an hour: Total cost with a PC is 1,005, total cost with a pocket calculator is 70, and total cost with paper and pencil is 81. Total cost is least with a pocket calculator.
When the wage rate is 50 an hour: Total cost with a PC is 1,050, total cost with a pocket calculator is 610, and the total cost with paper and pencil is 801. Total cost is least with a pocket calculator. When the wage rate is 500 an hour: Total cost with a PC is 1,500, total cost with a pocket calculator is 6,010, and total cost with pencil and paper is 8,001. Total cost is least with a PC.
5a. Methods a, b, c, and d are technologically efficient. Compare the amount of labour and capital used by the four methods. Start with method a. Moving from a to b to c to d, the amount of labour increases and the amount of capital decreases in each case.
5b. The economically efficient method in (i) is method d, in (ii) is methods c and d, and in (iii) is method a. The economically efficient method is the technologically efficient method that allows the 100 shirts to be washed at least cost.
(i) Total cost with method a is 1,001, total cost with method b is 805, total cost with method c is 420, and total cost with method d is 150. Method d has the lowest total cost.
(ii) Total cost with method a is 505, total cost with method b is 425, total cost with method c is 300, and total cost with method d is 300. Methods c and d have the lowest total cost.
(iii) Total cost with method a is 100, total cost with method b is 290, total cost with method c is 1,020, and total cost with method d is 2,505. Method a has the lowest total cost.
7a. The four-firm concentration ratio is 60.49.
The four-firm concentration ratio equals the ratio of the total sales of the largest four firms to the total industry sales expressed as a percentage. The total sales of the largest four firms is 450 + 325 + 250 + 200, which equals 1,225. Total industry sales equal 1,225 + 800, which equals 2,025. The four-firm concentration ratio equals (1,225/2,025) ΄ 100, which is 60.49 percent.
7b. This industry is highly concentrated because the four-firm concentration ratio exceeds 60 percent.
1a. To draw the total product curve measure labour on the x-axis and output on the y-axis. The total product curve is upward sloping./p>
1b. The average product of labour is equal to total product divided by the quantity of labour employed. For example, when 3 workers are employed, they produce 6 boats a week, so the average product is 2 boats per worker. The average product curve is upward sloping when the number of workers is between 1 and 8, but it becomes downward sloping when 9 and 10 workers are employed.
1c. The marginal product of labour is equal to the increase in total product when an additional worker is employed. For example, when 3 workers are employed, total product is 6 boats a week. When a fourth worker is employed, total product increases to 10 boats a week. The marginal product of going from 3 to 4 workers is 4 boats.The marginal product curve is upward sloping when the number of workers is between 1 and 6, but it becomes downward sloping when 7 or more workers are employed.
1d. (i) When Rubber Toys produces fewer than
30 Boats a week, it employs fewer than 8 workers a week. With fewer than 8
workers a week, marginal product exceeds average product and average product is
increasing. Up to an output of 30 boats a day, each additional worker adds more
to output than the average. Average product increases.
(ii) When Rubber Toys produces more than 30 boats a week, it employs
more than 8 workers a week. With more than 8 workers a week, average product
exceeds marginal product and average product is decreasing. For outputs greater
than 30 boats a week, each additional worker adds less to output than average.
Average
product decreases.
3a. Total cost is the sum of the
costs of all the inputs that Rubber Toys uses in production. Total variable
cost is the total cost of the variable inputs. Total fixed cost is the total
cost of the fixed inputs. For example,
the total variable cost of producing 10 boats a week is the total cost of the
workers employed, which is 4 workers at 400 a week, which equals 1,600. Total
fixed cost is 1,000, so the total cost of producing 10 boats a week is 2,600.
To draw the short-run total cost curves, plot output on the x-axis and
the total cost on the y-axis. The total fixed cost curve is a horizontal line
at 1,000. The total variable cost curve and the total cost curve have shapes
similar to those in Fig. 10.4, but the vertical distance between the total
variable cost
curve and the total cost curve is 1,000.
3b. Average fixed cost is total
fixed cost per unit of output. Average variable cost is total variable cost per
unit of output. Average total cost is the total cost per unit of output. For example, when the firm makes 10 boats a
week: Total fixed cost is 1,000, so average fixed cost is 100 per boat; total
variable cost is 1,600, so average variable cost is 160 per boat; and total
cost is 2,600, so average total cost is 260 per boat.
Marginal cost is the increase in total cost divided by the increase in
output. For example, when output
increases from 3 to 6 boats a week, total cost increases from 1,800 to 2,200,
an increase of 400. That is, the increase in output of 3 boats increases total
cost by 400. Marginal cost is equal to 400 divided by 3 boats, which is
133.33 a boat. The short-run average
and marginal cost curves are similar to those in Fig. 10.5.
5. The increase in total fixed
cost increases total cost but does not change total variable cost. Average
fixed cost is total fixed cost per unit of output.
The average fixed cost curve shifts upward. Average total cost is total
cost per unit of output. The average total cost curve shifts upward. Marginal
cost and average variable cost do not change.
7a. Total cost is the cost of all
the inputs. For example, when 3 workers are employed they now produce 12 boats
a week. With 3 workers, the total variable cost is 1,200 a week and the total
fixed cost is 2,000 a week. The total cost is 3,200 a week. The average total
cost of producing 12 Boats is 266.67.
7b. The long-run average cost
curve is made up the lowest parts of the firm's short-run average total cost
curves when the firm operates 1 plant and 2 plants. The long-run average cost
curve is similar to Fig. 10.8.
7c. It is efficient to operate
the plant that has the lower average total cost of a boat. It is efficient to
operate one plant when output is less than 27 boats a week, and it is efficient
to operate two plants when the output is more than 27 boats a week. Over the output range 1 to 27 boats a week,
average total cost is less with one plant than with two, but if output exceeds
27 Boats a week, average total cost is less with two plants than with one.
1a. Quick Copy's
profit-maximizing quantity is 80 pages an hour.
Quick Copy maximizes its profit by producing the quantity at which
marginal revenue equals marginal cost. In perfect competition, marginal revenue
equals price, which is 10 cents a page. Marginal cost is 10 pence when 80 pages
an hour are produced.
1b. Quick Copy's profit is £2.40
an hour. Profit equals total revenue
minus total cost. Total revenue equals £8.00 an hour (10 pence a page
multiplied by 80 pages). The average total cost of producing 80 pages is 7
pence a page, so total cost equals £5.60 an hour (7 pence multiplied by 80
pages). Profit equals £8.00 minus £5.60, which is £2.40 an hour.
1c. The price will fall in the
long run to 6 pence a page. At a price
of 10 pence a page, firms make economic profit. In the long run, the economic
profit will encourage new firms to enter the copying industry. As they do, the
price will fall and economic profit will decrease. Firms will enter until
economic profit is zero, which occurs when the price is 6 pence a copy (price
equals minimum average total cost).
3a. Pat's profit-maximizing
output is 4 pizzas an hour. Pat's profit is 2 an hour. Pat maximizes its profit by producing the
quantity at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost. In perfect
competition, marginal revenue equals price, which is 14 a pizza.
Marginal cost is the change in total cost when output is increased by 1
pizza an hour. The marginal cost of increasing output from 3 to 4 pizzas an
hour is 13 (54 minus 41). The marginal cost of increasing output from 4 to 5
pizzas an hour is 15 (69 minus 54). So the marginal cost of the fourth pizza
is half-way between 13 and 15, which is 14. Marginal cost equals marginal
revenue when Pat produces 4 pizzas an hour.
Economic profit equals total revenue minus total cost. Total revenue
equals 56 an hour (14 a pizza multiplied by 4 pizzas). Total cost of
producing 4 pizzas is 54. Economic profit equals 56 minus 54, which is 2 an
hour.
3b. Pat's shutdown point occurs
at a price of 10 a pizza. The shutdown
point is the price that equals minimum average variable cost. To calculate
total variable cost, subtract total fixed cost (10, which is total cost at
zero output) from total cost. Average variable cost equals total variable cost
divided by the quantity produced. For example, the average variable cost of
producing 2 pizzas is 10 a pizza. Average variable cost is a minimum when
marginal cost equals average variable cost. The marginal cost of producing 2
pizzas is 10. So the shutdown point is a price of 10 a pizza.
3c. Pat's supply curve is the
same as the marginal cost curve at prices equal to or above 10 a pizza and the
y-axis at prices below 10 a pizza.
3d. Pat will leave the industry
if in the long run the price is less than 13 a pizza. Pat's Pizza Kitchen will leave the industry
if it incurs an economic loss in the long run. To incur an economic loss, the
price will have to be below minimum average total cost. Average total cost
equals total cost divided by the quantity produced. For example, the average
total cost of producing 2 pizzas is 15 a pizza. Average total cost is a
minimum when it equals marginal cost.
The average total cost of 3 pizzas is 13.67, and the average total cost
of 4 pizzas is 13.50. Marginal cost when Pat's produces 3 pizzas is 12 and
marginal cost when Pat's produces 4 pizzas is 14. At 3 pizzas, marginal cost
is less than average total cost; at 4 pizzas, marginal cost exceeds average
total cost. So minimum average total cost occurs between 3 and 4 pizzas13 at
3.5 pizzas an hour.
3e. Firms with costs identical to
Pat's will enter at any price above 13 a pizza. Firms will enter an industry when firms
currently in the industry are making economic profit. Firms with costs
identical to Pat's will make economic profit when the price exceeds minimum
average total cost, which is 13 a pizza.
3f. The price in the long run is
13 a pizza. This is the price that makes zero economic profit.
5a. The market price is 8.40 a
cassette. The market price is the price
at which the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied. The firm's supply
curve is the same as its marginal cost curve at prices above minimum average
variable cost.
Average variable cost is a minimum when marginal cost equals average
variable cost. Marginal cost equal average variable cost at the quantity 250
cassettes a week. So the firm's supply curve is the same as the marginal cost
curve for the outputs equal to 250 cassettes or more. When the price is 8.40 a
cassette, each firm produces 350 cassettes and the quantity supplied by the
1,000 firms is 350,000 cassettes a week. The quantity demanded at 8.40 is
350,000 a week.
5b. The industry output is
350,000 cassettes a week.
5c. Each firm produces 350
cassettes a week.
5d. Each firm makes an economic
loss of 581 a week. Each firm produces 350 cassettes at an average total cost
of 10.06 a cassette. The firm can sell
the 350 cassettes for 8.40 a cassette. The firm incurs a loss on each cassette
of 1.66 and incurs an economic loss of 581a week.
5e. In the long run, some firms
exit the industry because they are incurring economic losses.
5f. The number of firms in the
long run is 750. In the long run, as
firms exit the industry, the price rises. In long-run equilibrium, the price
will equal the minimum average total cost. When output is 400 cassettes a week,
marginal cost equals average total cost and average total cost is a minimum at
10 a cassette. In the long run, the price is 10 a cassette. Each firm
remaining in the industry produces 400 cassettes a week. The quantity demanded
at 10 a cassette is 300,000 a week. So the number of firms is 300,000
cassettes divided by 400 cassettes per firm, which is 750 firms.
7a. The market price is 7.65 a
cassette. When the price is 7.65 a
cassette, each firm produces 300 cassettes and the quantity supplied by the
1,000 firms is 300,000 cassettes a week. The quantity demanded at 7.65 is
300,000 a week.
7b. The industry output is
300,000 cassettes a week.
7c. Each firm produces 300
cassettes a week.
7d. Each firm makes an economic
loss of 834 a week. Each firm produces 300 cassettes at an average total cost
of 10.43 a cassette. The firm can sell
the 300 cassettes for 7.65 a cassette. The firm incurs a loss on each cassette
of 2.78 and incurs an economic loss of 834 a week.
7e. In the long run, some firms
exit the industry because they are incurring economic losses.
7f. The number of firms in the
long run is 500. In the long run, as
firms exit the industry, the price rises. Each firm remaining in the industry
produces 400 cassettes a week. The quantity demanded at 10 a cassette is 200,000
a week. So the number of firms is 200,000 cassettes divide by 400 cassettes per
firm, which is 500 firms.
1a. Minnie's total revenue
schedule lists the total revenue at each quantity sold. For example, Minnie's
can sell 1 bottle for 8 a bottle, which gives it a total revenue of 8 at the
quantity 1 bottle.
1b. Minnie's marginal revenue
schedule lists the marginal revenue that results from increasing the quantity
sold by 1 bottle. For example, Minnie's can sell 1 bottle for a total revenue
of 8. Minnie's can sell 2 bottles for 6 each, which gives it a total revenue
of 12 at the quantity 2 bottles. So by increasing the quantity sold from 1
Bottle to 2 Bottles, marginal revenue is 4 a bottle (12 minus 8).
3a. Minnie's profit-maximizing
output is 1.5 bottles. The marginal cost
of increasing the quantity from 1 Bottle to 2 Bottles is 4 a bottle (7 minus
3). That is, the marginal cost of the 1.5 bottles is 4 a bottle. The marginal
revenue of increasing the quantity sold from 1 Bottle to 2 bottles is 4 (12
minus 8). So the marginal revenue from 1.5 bottles is 4 a bottle. Profit is
maximized when the quantity produced makes the marginal cost equal to marginal
revenue. The profit-maximizing output is 1.5 bottles.
3b. Minnie's profit-maximizing
price is 7 a bottle.
The profit-maximizing price is the highest price that Minnie's can sell
the profit-maximizing output of 1.5 bottles. Minnie's can sell 1 bottle for 8
and 2 bottles for 6, so it can sell 1.5 bottles for 7 a bottle.
3c. Minnie's marginal cost is 4
a bottle.
3d. Minnie's marginal revenue is
4 a bottle.
3e. Minnie's economic profit is
5.50.
Economic profit equals total revenue minus total cost. Total revenue
equals price (7 a bottle) multiplied by quantity (1.5 bottles), which is
10.50. Total cost of producing 1 Bottle is 3 and the total cost of producing
2 bottles is 7, so the total cost of producing 1.5 bottles is 5. Profit
equals 10.50 minus
5, which is 5.50.
3f. Minnie's is inefficient.
Minnie's charges a price of 7 a bottle, so consumers get a marginal benefit of
7 a bottle. Minnie's marginal cost is 4 a bottle. That is, the marginal
benefit of 7 a bottle exceeds Minnie's marginal cost.
5a. The profit-maximizing output
is 150 newspapers a day. Profit is maximized when the firm produces the output
at which marginal cost equals marginal revenue. Draw in the marginal revenue
curve. It runs from 100 on the y-axis to 250 on the x-axis. The marginal
revenue curve cuts the marginal cost curve at the quantity 150 newspapers a day.
5b. The price charged is 70 pence
a paper.
The highest price that the publisher can sell 150 newspapers a day is
read from
the demand curve.
5c. The daily total revenue is
£105 (150 papers at 70 pence each).
5d. Demand is elastic. Along a
straight-line demand curve, demand is elastic at all prices above the midpoint
of the demand curve. The price at the midpoint is 50 cents. So at 70 pence a
paper, demand is elastic.
7a. The efficient quantity is 250
newspapersthe quantity that makes marginal
benefit (price) equal to marginal cost. With 250 newspapers available,
some people are willing to pay 50 pence for a paper. To produce 250 newspapers,
the publisher incurs a marginal cost of 50 pence a paper.
7b. The consumer surplus is
£22.50 a day. Consumer surplus is the
area under the demand curve above the price. The price is 70 pence, so consumer
surplus equals (100 cents minus 70 cents) multiplied by 150/2 papers a day,
which is £22.50 a day.
7c. The deadweight loss is £15 a
day. Deadweight loss arises because the
publisher does not produce the efficient quantity. Output is restricted to 150,
and the price is increased to 70 pence.
The deadweight loss equals (70 pence minus 40 pence) multiplied by
100/2.
9. The maximum that will be
spent on rent seeking is 5.50 a day an amount equal to Minnie's economic
profit. The total social cost equals the deadweight loss plus the amount spent
on rent seeking. To calculate the deadweight loss, first calculate the
efficient outputthe intersection point of the demand curve
(marginal benefit curve) and the marginal cost curve. Do this by finding
the equations to the two curves and solving them. The efficient output is 2.25
bottles. The deadweight loss equals 1.125. The loss to society is 6.625
(5.50 plus 1.125).
11a. The firm will produce 2
cubic metres a day and sell it for 6 pence a cubic metre. Deadweight loss will
be 4 cents a day. Draw in the marginal
revenue curve. It runs from 10 on the y-axis to 2.5 on the x-axis. The profit-
maximizing output is 2 cubic metres at which marginal revenue equals marginal
cost. The price charged is the highest that people will pay for 2 cubic metres
a day, which is 6 pence a cubic metre. The efficient output is 4 cubic metres,
at which marginal cost equals price (marginal benefit). So the deadweight loss
is (4 minus 2 cubic metres) multiplied by (6 minus 2 pence)/2.
11b. The firm will produce 3
cubic metres a day and charge 4 pence a cubic metre. Deadweight loss is 1 pence
a day. If the firm is regulated to earn
only normal profit, it produces the output at which price equals average total
cost at the intersection of the demand curve and the ATC curve.
11c. The firm will produce 4
cubic metres a day and charge 2 pence a cubic metre. There is no deadweight loss. If the firm is regulated to be efficient, it
will produce the quantity at which price (marginal benefit) equals marginal
costat the intersection of the demand curve and the marginal cost curve.
1a. Lite
and Kool produces 100 pairs a week. To maximize profit, Lite
and Kool produces the quantity at which marginal
revenue equals marginal cost.
1b. Lite
and Kool charges 20 a pair. To maximize profit, Lite
and Kool charges the highest price for the 100 pairs
of shoes, as read from the demand curve.
1c. Lite
and Kool makes a profit of 500 a week. Economic profit equals total revenue minus
total cost. The price is 20 and the quantity sold is 100 pairs, so total
revenue is 2,000. Average total cost is 15, so total cost equals 1,500.
Economic profit equals 2,000 minus 1,500, which is 500 a week.
3a. The firm produces 100 pairs
and sells them for 60 a pair. To
maximize profit, the firm produces the quantity at which marginal cost equals
marginal revenue. Marginal cost is 20 a pair. The firm can sell 200 pairs at
20 a pair, so the marginal revenue is 20 at 100 pairs. (Marginal revenue
curve lies halfway between the y-axis and the demand curve.) The firm sells the
100 pairs at the highest price that consumers will pay, which is read from the
demand curve. This price is 60 a pair.
3b. The firm's economic profit is
zero. The firm produces 100 pairs and
sells them for 60 a pair, so total revenue is 6,000. Total cost is the sum of
total fixed cost plus total variable cost of 100 pairs. Total cost equals
4,000 plus (20 multiplied by 100), which is 6,000. The firm's profit is
zero.
3c. The firm produces 200 pairs
and sells them for 60 a pair. To
maximize profit, the firm produces the quantity at which marginal cost equals marginal
revenue. Marginal cost is 20 a pair. At 20 a pair, the firm can sell 400
pairs (twice the number with no advertising), so the marginal revenue is 20 at
200 pairs. (The marginal revenue curve lies halfway between the y-axis and the
demand curve.) The firm sells the 200
pairs at the highest price that consumers will payread from the demand curve.
This price is 60 a pair.
3d. The firm makes an economic
profit of 1,000. The firm produces 200
pairs and sells them for 60 a pair, so total revenue is 12,000. Total cost is
the sum of total fixed cost plus the advertising cost plus total variable cost
of 200 pairs. Total cost equals 4,000 plus 3,000 plus (20 multiplied by
200), which is 11,000. The firm makes an economic profit of 1,000.
3e. The firm will spend 3,000
advertising because it makes more economic profit than when it does not
advertise.
5. The firm will not change the
quantity it produces or the price it charges.
The firm makes less economic profit.
The firm maximizes profit by producing the output at which marginal cost
equals marginal revenue. An increase in fixed cost increases total cost, but it
does not change marginal cost. So the firm does not change its output or the
price it charges. The firm's total costs have increased and its total revenue
has not changed, so the firm makes less economic profit.
7a. The price rises, output
increases, and economic profit increases.
The dominant firm produces the quantity and sets the price such that it
maximizes its profit. When demand increases, marginal revenue increases, so the
firm produces a larger output. The highest price at which the dominant firm can
sell its output increases. Because price exceeds marginal cost, economic profit
increases.
7b. The price rises, output increases,
and economic profit increases. The small
firms are price takers, so the price they charge rises. Because these firms are
price takers, the price is also marginal revenue. Because marginal revenue
increases, the small firms move up along their marginal cost curves (supply
curves) and increase the quantity they produce. Because price exceeds marginal
cost, economic profit increases.
9a. The game has 2 players (A and
B), and each player has 2 strategies: to answer honestly or to lie. There are 4
payoffs: A and B answer honestly; A and B lies; A lies, and B answers honestly;
and B lies, and A answers honestly.
9b. The payoff matrix has the
following cells: A and B answer honestly: A gets 100, and B gets 100; A and B
lie: A gets 50, and B gets 50; A lies and B answers honestly: A gets 500,
and B gets 0; B lies and A answers honestly: A gets 0, and B gets 500.
9c. Equilibrium is that each
player lies and gets 50.
If B answers honestly, the best strategy for A is to lie because he
would get 500 rather than 100. If B lies, the best strategy for A is to lie
because he would get 50 rather than 0. So A's best strategy is to lie, no
matter what B does. Repeat the exercise for B. B's best strategy is to lie, no
matter what A
does.
11a. The best strategy for each
firm is to cheat. If Sudsies
abides by the agreement, the best strategy for Soapy is to cheat because it
would make a profit of 1.5 million rather than 1 million. If Sudsies cheats, the best strategy for Soapy is to cheat
because it would make a profit of 0 (the competitive outcome) rather than
incur a loss of 0.5 million. So Soapy's best strategy is to cheat, no matter what Sudsies does. Repeat the exercise for Sudsies.
Sudsies's best strategy is to cheat, no matter what
Soapy does.
11b. Each firm makes a zero
economic profit or normal profit. If
both firms cheat, each firm will lower the price in an attempt to gain market
share from the other firm. In the process, the price will be driven down until
each firm is making normal profit.
11c. The payoff matrix has the
following cells: Both abide by the agreement: Soapy makes 1 million, profit
and Sudsies makes 1 million profit; both cheat:
Soapy makes 0 profit, and Sudsies makes 0 profit;
Soapy cheats and Sudsies abides by the agreement:
Soapy makes 1.5 million profit, and Sudsies incurs a
0.5 million loss; Sudsies cheats and Soapy
abides by the agreement: Sudsies makes 1.5 million
profit, and Soapy incurs 0.5 million loss.
11d. The equilibrium is that both
firms cheat and each makes normal profit.
11e. Each firm can adopt a
tit-for-tat strategy or a trigger strategy. Pages 297-280 give descriptions of
these strategies.
1a. The wage rate is 6 an hour.
The wage rate adjusts to make the quantity of labour demanded equal to the
quantity supplied.
1b. The number of pickers hired
is 400 a day. At a wage rate of 6 an hour, 400 pickers a day are hired.
1c. The income received is 2,400
an hour. Income equals the wage rate (6 an hour) multiplied by the number of
pickers (400).
3a. Marginal product of labour is
the increase in total product that results from hiring one additional student.
For example, if Wanda increases the number of students hired from 2 to 3, total
product (the quantity of fish packed) increases from 50 to 90 kilograms. The
marginal product of hiring the third
student is 40 kilograms of fish.
3b. Marginal revenue product of
labour is the increase in total revenue that results from hiring one additional
student. For example, if Wanda hires 2 students, they produce 50 kilograms of
fish and Wanda sells the fish for 50 cents a kilogram. Total revenue is 25. If
Wanda increases the number of students hired from 2 to 3, total product
increases to 90 kilograms. Total revenue from the sale of this fish is 45.
Marginal revenue product resulting from hiring the third student is 20 (45
minus 25). Alternatively, marginal
revenue product equals marginal product multiplied by marginal revenue
(price).
Marginal revenue product of hiring the third student is 20, which is 40
kilograms of fish she sells at 50 cents a kilogram.3c. One point on Wanda's demand for labour curve:
At a wage rate of 20 an hour, Wanda will hire 3 students. The demand for
labour curve is the same as the marginal revenue product curve.
3d. Wanda hires 7 students.
Wanda hires the number of students that makes the marginal revenue
product equals to the wage rate of 7.50 an hour. When Wanda increases the
number of students from 6 to 7, marginal product is 15 kilograms of fish an
hour, which Wanda sells for 50 cents a kilogram. Marginal revenue product is
7.50the same
as the wage rate.
5a. Marginal product does not
change. Marginal product that results from hiring
the third student is still 40 kilograms of fish.
5b. Marginal revenue product decreases.If Wanda hires the third student, marginal
product is 40 kilograms of fish. But now Wanda sells the fish for 33.33 cents,
so marginal revenue product is now
13.33, down from 20.
5c. Wanda's demand for labour
decreases, and her demand for labour curve shifts leftward. Wanda is willing to
pay the students their marginal revenue product, and the fall in the price of
fish has lowered their marginal revenue product.
5d. Wanda will hire fewer
students. At the wage rate of 7.50, the number of students Wanda hires
decreases as the demand for labour curve shifts leftward.
7a. Marginal revenue product does
not change. If Wanda hires the third student, marginal product is 40 kilograms
of fish and Wanda sells the fish for 50 cents a kilogram, so marginal revenue
product remains at 20.
7b. Wanda's demand for labour
remains the same because marginal revenue product has not changed.
7c. Wanda will hire fewer students.
At the wage rate of 10 an hour, Wanda hires the number of students that makes
marginal revenue product equal to 10 an hour. Wanda now hires 6 studentsdown
from 7.
9. The marginal product that
results when Wanda hires the sixth student is 20 kilograms of fish an hour, and
Wanda sells this fish for 50 cents a kilogram. Marginal revenue product of the
sixth student is 10 an hour. Wanda
maximizes her profit when marginal revenue product equals the wage rate and
when marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
When the wage rate is 7.50 an hour, Wanda hires 7 students. Marginal
revenue product is marginal product (15 kilograms of fish an hour) multiplied
by the price of fish (50 cents a kilogram), which equals 7.50 an hour. Marginal revenue resulting from selling an
additional kilogram of fish is 50 cents. The seventh student costs 7.50 an
hour and has a marginal product of 15 kilograms of fish. So the marginal cost
of an additional kilogram of fish is 7.50 an hour divided by 15 kilograms of
fish, which is 50 cents. So when Wanda hires 7 students, marginal revenue
equals marginal cost and profit is maximized.
11. Venus installs three
production lines. With one production
line: The present value of the marginal revenue product in the first year is
590,000/1.05, which is 561,904.76. The present value of the marginal revenue
product in the second year is 590,000/(1.05)2, which is 535,147.39. So the
present value of the flow of marginal revenue product is 1,097,052.15. The
cost of one production line is 1 million. The net present value is 97,052.15,
so Venus buys the production line.
Similar calculations for 2 and 3 production lines give positive net
present values, so Venus installs 3 production lines.
13. To answer this problem, we
need to know the interest rate and the price that Greg expects next year. If he
expects the price to rise by a bigger percentage than the interest rate, he
pumps none and waits for the higher price. If he expects the price to rise by a
smaller percentage than the interest rate, he pumps it all now. If he expects
the price to rise by a percentage equal to the interest rate, he doesn't mind
how much he pumps.
15a. Income of 2,400 a day is
divided between opportunity cost and economic rent. Economic rent is the area
above the supply curve below the wage rate. To show the economic rent on the
graph, extend the supply curve until it touches the y-axis. Shade in the
area above the supply curve up to the wage rate 6 an
hour. Opportunity cost is the area under the supply curve. To show the
opportunity cost on the graph, shade in the area under the supply curve up to
400 pickers on the x-axis.
1a. To draw the Lorenz curve,
plot the cumulative percentage of households on the x-axis and the
cumulative percentage of income on the y-axis. Make the scale on the two axes
the same. The Lorenz curve will pass through the following points: 20 percent
on the x-axis and 5 percent on the y-axis; 40 percent on the x-axis
and 16 percent on the y-axis; 60 percent on the x-axis and 33 percent on
the y-axis; 80 percent on the x-axis and 57 percent on the
y-axis; and 100 percent on the x-axis and 100 percent on the y-axis.
1b. Compare the data to the table
in Figure 15.1. UK income is distributed
less equally than the income in the economy in this problem. The line of equality shows an equal
distribution of income. The closer the Lorenz curve is to the line of equality,
the more equal is the income distribution. The Lorenz curve for the UK economy
lies beneath the Lorenz curve for the economy in this problem.
3a. The distributions of income
and wealth are the same. Every 45-year-old person has income of 30,000 a year
and wealth of 255,000. Each 45-year-old person has earned 30,000 a year for
31 years, a total of 930,000. The lifetime income will be 1,050,000 (35
multiplied by 30,000). Because total income is consumed over the lifetime and
at a constant rate, consumption is 15,000 a year (1,050,000 divided by 70).
Total consumption of a 45-year-old person is 675,000 (45 multiplied by
15,000). So the accumulated savings (wealth) at 45 years of age is 255,000
(930,000 minus 675,000).
3b. Income is 30,000 a year for
the people aged 25, 35, and 45 and zero for the people aged 55 and 65. Wealth
is distributed unequally. Wealth is -45,000 for the 25-year-old; 105,000 for
the 35-year-old; 255,000 for the 45-year-old; 225,000 for the 55-year-old;
and 75,000 for the 65-year-old. (Each calculation is similar to that in answer
1a.) Case (a) shows greater equality
than case (b). The distributions of wealth and income are equal in case (a) but
unequal in case (b).
5a. The average wage rate is 3
an hour. In an hour, the 10 people earn
a total of 30. So the average wage rate is 3 an hour.
5b. The ratio of the highest to
the lowest wage is 5/1 (5/1).
5c. Average daily income is 14.50 an hour. To calculate the total income earned, start
with a wage rate and find the number of hours each will work at that wage rate
(first table); then find the number of people who work at that wage rate
(second table). For example, if the wage rate is 3 an hour, the people who
work at this wage rate will work for 4 hours a day and the number of people who
will work at 3 an hour is 4 people. The
total daily income of these 4 people is 48 (3 multiplied by 4 multiplied by
4). Total income of the 10 people is
145 a day. Average daily income is equal to 14.50.
5d. The ratio of the highest to
the lowest daily income is 40/1. The
highest daily income earned is 40. At 5 an hour, 1 person works and that
person works for 8 hours a day. The lowest daily income is 1. At 1 an hour, 1
person works and that person works for 1 hour a day. The ratio of highest to
lowest daily income is 40/1.
5e. The distribution of hourly
wage rates is symmetrically around the average wage rate of 3.00 an hour. At
1 an hour, 10 percent of people (1 person) work; at 2 an hour, 20 percent of
people (2 people) work; at 3 an hour, 40 percent of people (4 people) work; at
4 an hour, 20 percent of people (2 people) work;
at 5 an hour, 10 percent of people (1 person) work.
5f. The distribution of daily incomes
is skewed to the left: 1 a day is earned by 10 percent of people (1 person);
4 a day is earned by 20 percent of people (2 people); 12 a day is earned by
40 percent of people (4 people); 24 a day is earned by 20 percent of people (2
people); 40 a day is earned by 10 percent of people (1 person). The most
common income (12 a day) is less than the average income (14.50 a day).
5g. The distribution of income is
skewed despite the equal distribution of abilities (as indicated by the
distribution of wage rates). The distribution of income is influenced by the
choices people make about how many hours to work.
7a. To draw the Lorenz curve
before redistribution takes place, calculate the percentage of income that each
20 percent of households receive. Then plot the cumulative percentage of
households on the x-axis and the cumulative percentage of income after taxes
and benefits on the y-axis. Make the scale on the two axes the same. The
Lorenz curve passes through the following points: 20 percent on the x-axis
and 5 percent on the y-axis; 40 percent on the x-axis and 15 percent on
the y-axis; 60 percent on the x-axis and 33 percent on the y-axis; 80
percent on the x-axis and 61 percent on the y-axis; and 100 percent on
the x-axis and 100 percent on the y-axis.
Now calculate the income after taxes and benefits for each 20 percent of
households. The income for each 20 percent of households equals market income
minus taxes plus benefits. For example, for the third lowest 20 percentage of
households, income after taxes and benefits equals 18 million minus taxes of
2.7 million (15 percent of 18 million) plus benefits of 3 million, which
equals 18.3 million. Now draw the
Lorenz curve after redistribution takes place by plotting plot the cumulative
percentage of households on the x-axis and the cumulative percentage of income
after taxes and benefits on the y-axis. The Lorenz curve passes through
the following points: 20 percent on the x-axis and 15.0 percent on the
y-axis; 40 percent on the x-axis and 32.0 percent on the y-axis; 60 percent on
the x-axis and 50.3 percent on the y-axis; 80 percent on the x-axis
and 72.7 percent on the y-axis; and 100 percent on the x-axis and 100 percent
on the y-axis.
7b. To answer this question, you
will need information for the Lorenz curve for the Canadian economy. Here is information on the bottom 20% and the
top 20% of family incomes in Canada.
Compare these two points to your data in the problem.
Percentage Market income Income
after redistribution
(percentage
of total income)
20 1.6 7.4
40
60
80
100 46.4 36.4
The government of this economy redistributes income differently that
does the Canadian government. Plot the Lorenz curves for market income and for
income after redistribution on the same graph as the Lorenz curves for Canada.
Now, compare the amounts of redistribution in this economy with that in
the Canadian economy. Income after redistribution for the 20 percent of
households in the Canadian economy with the lowest income increases from 1.6
percent of total income to 7.4 percentan increase of 427 percent. Income after
redistribution for the 20 percent of households in the Canadian economy with
the highest income decreases from 46.4 percent of total income to 36.4
percenta decrease of 21.6 percent.
In the economy in this problem, income after redistribution for the 20
percent of households with the lowest income increases from 5 percent of total
income to 15 percentan increase of 200 percent. Income after redistribution
for the 20 percent of households with the highest income decreases from 39.0
percent of total income to 27.3 percenta decrease of 30 percent.
1a. The capacity that achieves
maximum net benefit is 2.5 million litres a day.
Net benefit is maximized at the capacity where marginal benefit equals
marginal cost, which is 2.5 million litres a day.
1b. 62.50 per person.
The efficient capacity is the one that maximizes net benefit. Total cost
of the sewerage system is the sum of the marginal cost of each additional litre
of capacity. That is, total cost is the area under that marginal cost curve up
to 2.5 million litres, which equals 62.5 million. The population is 1 million,
so each person will have to pay 62.50.
1c. The political equilibrium
will be a sewerage system that has a capacity of 2.5 million litres. If voters are well informed, the political
equilibrium will be the efficient capacity.
1d. Bureaucrats will provide a
capacity of 5 million litres. With
voters rationally ignorant, bureaucrats will maximize the budget. That is, they
will increase the capacity until net benefit is zero. The total benefit from a
capacity of 5 million litres is 250 million. The total cost of a capacity of 5
million litres is 250 million. So the net benefit from a capacity of 5 million
litres is zero.
3a. Taxes will be progressive:
B-type people will pay a higher tax rate than A-type people. The median voter theorem tells us the tax
arrangement will be that which minimizes the taxes of the median voter. The
median voter is an A-type person.
3b. The before-tax wage rate of
A-type people will rise by the amount of the tax, and fewer A-type people will
be employed. The after-tax wage rate will remain at 10 an hour. The before-tax
wage rate of B-type people will remain at 100, and employment of B-type people
will not change. The after-tax wage rate
will fall by the amount of the tax.
5a. The equilibrium wage rate is
12 an hour, and 30 hours of work are done each week. Equilibrium wage rate is such that the
quantity of labour demanded equals the quantity of labour supplied. Hours of
work done equal the equilibrium quantity of labour hired.
5b. (i)
The new wage rate is 13.60 an hour. (ii) The new number of hours worked is 24
a week. (iii) The after-tax wage rate is 9.60 an hour. (iv) The tax revenue is
96.00 a week (v) Deadweight loss is 12 a week. To work out an answer to this problem, either
draw an exact graph (like Fig. 18.8b) or use equations. The equation for the
pre-tax demand for labour curve is W = -(8/30)L + 20, where W is the wage rate and L is hours of labour.
The equation for the demand for labour curve once the employment insurance tax
is imposed on employers is W = -(8/30)L +
16. The equation for the supply of labour curve is W = (12/30)L. So the
equilibrium employment is 24 hours a week. To find the cost of labour,
substitute 24 for L in the demand for labour curve. To find the after-tax wage
rate, substitute 24 for L in the demand for labour curve after the tax is
imposed. The tax revenue is 4 an hour multiplied by the 24 hours employed. The
deadweight loss equals the tax multiplied by half the cut in employmentthat
is, 4 multiplied by (30 - 24)/2.
7a. The equilibrium price is 3 a
kilogram, and the equilibrium quantity is 14 kilograms a month. To work out the answer to this problem,
either draw an exact graph (like Fig. 18.9) or use equations. The equation for
the demand curve is P = -(1/2)Q + 10. The
equation for the supply curve before the tax is imposed is P = (1/2)Q
- 4. Solving these equations
gives an equilibrium price of 3 a kilogram and an equilibrium quantity of 14
kilograms a month.
7b. (i)
The new price is 4 a kilogram. (ii) The new quantity is 12 kilograms a month.
(iii) Tax revenue is 24 a month. (iv) Deadweight loss is 2 a month.
With the 2 a kilogram tax, the supply curve becomes P = (1/2)Q
- 2. Solving the new supply
curve and the demand curve gives a price of 4 a kilogram, and 12 kilograms a
month are bought. The tax revenue is 2 a kilogram multiplied by the 12
kilograms bought. The deadweight loss equals the tax multiplied by half the
cut in the quantity bought, that is, 2 multiplied by (14 - 12)/2.
1a. The price is 30 cents a
Bottle. Elixir Springs is a natural monopoly. It produces the quantity that
makes marginal revenue equal to marginal cost, and it charges the highest price
it can for the quantity produced. The marginal revenue curve is twice as steep
as the demand curve, so it runs from 50 on the y-axis to 1.25 on the x-axis.
Marginal revenue equals marginal cost at 1 million bottles a year. The highest
price at which Elixir can sell 1 million bottles a year is 30 cents a bottle,
read from the demand curve.
1b. Elixir Springs sells 1
million Bottles a year.
1c. Elixir maximizes producer
surplus.
If Elixir maximizes total surplus, it would produce the quantity that
makes price equal to marginal cost. That is, it would produce 2 million bottles
a year and sell them for 10 cents a bottles. Elixir is a natural monopoly, and
it maximizes its producer surplus.
3a. The price is 10 cents a
bottle. Marginal cost pricing regulation
sets the price equal to marginal cost, 10 cents a bottle.
3b. Elixir sells 2 million
bottles. With the price set at 10 cents,
Elixir maximizes profit by producing 2 million bottles at the intersection of
the demand curve (which shows price) and the marginal cost curve.
3c. Elixir incurs an economic
loss of 150,000 a year. Economic profit
equals total revenue minus total cost. Total revenue is 200,000 (2 million
bottles at 10 cents a bottle). Total cost is 350,000 (total variable cost of
200,000 plus total fixed cost of 150,000). So Elixir incurs an economic loss
of 150,000 (a revenue of 200,000 minus 350,000).
3d. Consumer surplus is 400,000
a year. Consumer surplus is the area
under the demand curve above the price. Consumer surplus equals 40 cents a
bottle (50 cents minus 10 cents) multiplied by 2 million bottles divided by 2,
which is 400,000.
3e. The regulation is in the
public interest because total surplus is maximized. The outcome is
efficient. The outcome is efficient
because marginal benefit (or price) equals marginal cost. When the outcome is
efficient, total surplus is maximized.
5a. The price is 20 cents a
bottle. Average cost pricing regulation
sets the price equal to average total cost. Average total cost equals average
fixed cost plus average variable cost. Because marginal cost is constant at 10
cents, average variable cost equals marginal cost. Average fixed cost is total
fixed cost (150,000) divided by the quantity produced. For example, when
Elixir produces 1.5 million bottles, average fixed cost is 10 cents, so average
total cost is 20 cents. The price at which Elixir can sell 1.5 million bottles
a year is 20 cents a bottle.
5b. Elixir sells 1.5 million
bottles.
5c. Elixir makes zero economic
profit. Economic profit equals total
revenue minus total cost. Total revenue is 300,000 (1.5 million bottles at 20
cents a bottle). Total cost is 300,000 (1.5 million bottles at an average
total cost of 20 cents). So Elixir makes zero economic profit.
5d. Consumer surplus is 225,000 a year.
Consumer surplus is the area under the demand curve above the price.
Consumer surplus equals 30 cents a bottle (50 cents minus 20 cents) multiplied
by 1.5 million bottles divided by 2, which is 225,000.
5e. The regulation creates a
deadweight loss, so the outcome is inefficient.
The regulation is not in the public interest.
7a. The price is 500 a trip, and
the quantity is 2 trips a day.
Regulation in the public interest is marginal cost pricing. Each airline
charges 500 a trip and produces the quantity at which price equals marginal
cost. Each airline makes 1 trip a day.
7b. The price is 750 a trip, and
the number of trips is 1 trip a day (one by
each airline on alternate days).
If the airlines capture the regulator, the price will be the same as the
price that an unregulated monopoly would charge. An unregulated monopoly
produces the quantity and charges the price that maximizes profitΎthat is, the
quantity that makes marginal revenue equals to marginal cost. This quantity is
1 trip a day, and the highest price that the airlines can charge for that trip
(read from the demand curve) is 750.
7c. Deadweight loss is 125 a day.
Deadweight loss arises because the number of trips is cut from 2 to 1 a
day and the price is increased from 500 to 750. Deadweight loss equals (2
minus 1) trip multiplied by (750 minus 500) divided by 2. Deadweight loss is
125 a day.
1a. The efficient amount of waste
is 3 tonnes a week. The efficient amount
of waste is the quantity that makes the marginal cost equal to marginal
benefit. When the pesticide factory dumps 2 tonnes of waste, the trout farm's
profit is 875 per week. When the pesticide factory dumps 3 tonnes of waste,
the trout farm's profit is 775 per week. The loss of profit from the third
tonne of waste is 100. The marginal benefit to the pesticide factory of
dumping the waste (the cost cut by not trucking the waste) is 100 a tonne.
That is, the marginal cost of the third tonne to the trout farm equals the
marginal benefit of the third tonne to the pesticide factory.
1b. If the trout farm owns the
lake, the amount of waste is 3 tonnes a week.The
pesticide factory pays the trout farm 100 a tonne for the right to dump 3
tonnes of waste a week.
1c. If the pesticide factory owns
the lake, the amount of waste is 3 tonnes a week. The trout farm pays the pesticide factory
300 a week for farming rights and for an agreement that the dumping of waste
will not exceed 3 tonnes a week.
3a. A tax of 100 a tonne will
achieve an efficient quantity of waste dumped into the lake. The cost of dumping the waste is zero, so the
pesticide factory will dump all its waste. A tax of 100 a tonne will increase
the marginal cost of dumping and reduce the amount of waste dumped to 3 tonnes
a week.
3b. If no one owns the lake (that
is, property rights do not exist), the efficient amount of dumped waste can be
achieved by imposing the appropriate tax on the polluter.
5a. The market price of a permit
is 150 (or 100 a tonne). The trout farm sells its permit to the factory. The factory and the farm share equally the
permits to dump 3 tonnes of waste. That
is, each has a permit to dump 1.5 tonnes of waste. The efficient amount of
waste is 3 tonnes, so the farm sells its permit to pollute to the factory for
100 a tonne.
5c. The cost of dumping the waste
is zero, so the pesticide factory will dump all its waste. A marketable
pollution permit of 100 a tonne will increase the marginal cost of dumping and
reduce the amount of waste dumped to 3 tonnes a week. In this problem, the
factory has a permit to dump 1.5 tonnes of waste a
week. To be able to dump another 1.5 tonnes a week, the factory must buy
the permit from the trout farm. The alternative to dumping the 1.5 tonnes is to
truck it at a cost of 100 a tonne. So the opportunity cost of buying the
permit is 150.
7a. If schools are competitive,
30,000 students enrol and tuition is 4,000 a year. In a competitive market, schools maximize
profit. They produce the quantity at which the marginal benefit of the last
student enrolled equals the marginal cost of educating the last student
enrolled. Tuition is 4,000 a student.
7b. Efficient number of places is
50,000, and tuition is 4,000 a student.
The efficient number of places is such that the marginal social benefit
of education equals the marginal cost of education. The marginal social benefit
equals the marginal private benefit plus the external benefit. For example, the
marginal social benefit of 50,000 places equals the marginal private benefit of
2,000 plus the external benefit of 2,000, which is 4,000.
1. Go to Economics in Action, Chapter 19, Problem 1, and use the graph
provided to find the solution to this problem.
3a. The growth rate in India was positive in every year from 1989 to 1996. The
growth rate was fastest in 1989.
3b. The growth rate was not negative in Pakistan in this period. The growth
rate was slowest in 1993.
3c. Between 1989 and 1990, growth rates in Pakistan and India both decreased.
Between 1990 and 1991, the growth rate in Pakistan increased while the growth
rate in India decreased. Between 1991 and 1992, both growth rates increased.
Between 1992 and 1993, both growth rates decreased. From 1993 to 1995, both
growth rates increased. In 1996, the two growth rates were approximately equal.
5a. Germany had one recession in the fourth quarter of 1992 and the first
quarter of 1993.
The large black dots are the first quarter of each year and the small grey dots
are the second, third, and fourth quarter. A recession is a period during which
real GDP decreases for at least two successive quarters. Real GDP decreased in
the fourth quarter of 1992 and the first quarter of 1993.
5b. Germany experienced a business cycle peak in the first quarter of 1992.
A business cycle peak is the upper turning point. A peak occurs when real GDP
stops growing and starts to decrease.
5c. Germany experienced a business cycle trough in the first quarter of 1993.
A business cycle trough is the lower turning point of a business cycle where a
recession ends and an expansion begins.
5d. Germany experienced an expansion during the fourth quarter of 1991 and the
first quarter of 1992 and in every quarter after the first quarter of 1993.
An expansion is a period during which real GDP increases.
7. Go to Economics in Action, Chapter 19, Problem 7, and use the graph
provided to find the solution to this problem.
9. Go to Economics in Action, Chapter 19, Problem 9, and use the graph
provided to find the solution to this problem.
Return to Index
1. Marthas initial capital stock is 5 copiers, depreciation is 1 copier per
year, gross investment is 3 copiers, net investment is 2 copiers, and the final
capital stock is 7 copiers.
Final capital stock equals initial capital stock plus net investment. Net
investment equals gross investment minus depreciation.
3a. Aggregate expenditure is £60 million.
Aggregate expenditure is the sum of consumption expenditure, investment,
government expenditures, and net exports. In the figure, B is consumption
expenditure, D is investment, C is government expenditures, and E is net
exports. Therefore aggregate expenditure equals £30 million plus £15 million
plus £12 million plus £3 million, which is £60 million.
3b. Aggregate income is £60 million.
Aggregate income equals aggregate expenditure, which from 3a is £60 million.
3c. GDP is £60 million.
GDP equals aggregate expenditure, which from 3a is £60 million.
3d. Government budget deficit is £2 million.
Government budget deficit equals government expenditures minus taxes. C is
government expenditures, and A is taxes. So the government budget deficit equals
£12 million minus £10 million, which is £2 million.
3e. Household saving is £20 million.
Household saving equals aggregate income minus consumption expenditure minus
taxes. In the figure, B is consumption expenditure and A is taxes. Therefore
household saving equals £60 million minus £30 million minus £10 million, which
is £20 million.
3f. Government saving is minus £2 million.
Government saving equals taxes minus government expenditures. In the figure, A
is taxes and C is government expenditures. Therefore government saving equals
£10 million minus £12 million, which is minus £2 million.
3g. Foreign borrowing is £3 million.
Foreign borrowing equals net exports. E is net exports, and net exports equals
£3 million. Lotus Island is in surplus, so foreigners are in deficit and they
must borrow from us to pay for their deficit. Foreign borrowing equals £3
million.
3h. National saving is £18 million.
National saving equals the sum of household saving and government saving.
Household saving is £20 million (see answer 3e). Government saving is minus £2
million (see answer 3f). Therefore national saving equals £20 million minus £2
million, which is £18 million.
5a. Ecoland's GDP is 1,100,000.
GDP equals the sum of consumption expenditure plus investment plus government
expenditures plus net exports. That is, GDP equals 600,000 plus 250,000 plus
200,000 plus 300,000 minus 250,000. GDP equals 1,100,000.
5b. Expenditure approach. Income approach cannot be used because there are no
data on interest, rent, profits, depreciation, and indirect taxes and subsidies.
5c. Injections equal leakages.
Injections are investment, government expenditures, and exports. Total
injections are 250,000 plus 200,000 plus 300,000 which equals 750,000.
Leakages are saving, net taxes, and imports. Total leakages are 300,000 plus
200,000 plus 250,000 which equals 750,000.
7a. The basket used in the CPI is 10 bottles of juice and 5 lengths of cloth.
The basket used in the CPI is the typical basket consumed in the base year. In
the base year, the typical family spends £40 on juice and juice costs £4 a
bottle, so the family buys 10 bottles of juice. In the base year, the typical
family spends £25 on cloth and cloth costs £5 a length, so the family buys 5
lengths of cloth.
7b. The CPI in the current year is 107.69
Expenditure on the CPI basket in the current year is 10 bottles of juice @ £4 a
bottle plus 5 lengths of cloth @ £6 a length, which is £70. The expenditure on
the CPI basket in the base year is £40 plus £25, which is £65. The CPI in the
current year equals the expenditure on the basket in the current year divided by
the expenditure on the basket in the base year, multiplied by 100. The CPI is
107.69.
7c. The inflation rate in the current year is 7.69 percent.
The CPI in the base year is 100 and the CPI in the current year is 107.69, and
the inflation rate is the rate of change of the CPI. The inflation rate equals
(107.69 - 100)/100, which is 7.69 percent.
9a. In 1997, GDP is £7,000 and real GDP is £7,000. In 1998, GDP is £7,500 and
real GDP is £7,450.
GDP is equal to total expenditure on the goods and services produced by
Bananaland in 1997. Expenditure on bananas is 1,000 bunches @ £2 a bunch, which
is £2,000. Expenditure on sunscreen is 500 bottles @ £10 a bottle, which is
£5,000. Total expenditure is £7,000. So GDP in 1997 is £7,000.
Real GDP in 1997 is equal to Bananalands 1997 output valued at base-year prices. Because 1997 is the base year, real GDP in 1997 equals £7,000.
GDP in 1998 is equal to total expenditure on the goods and services produced by
Bananaland in 1998. Expenditure on bananas is 1,100 bunches @ £3 a bunch, which
is £3,300. Expenditure on sunscreen is 525 bottles @ £8 a bottle, which is
£4,200. Total expenditure is £7,500. So GDP is £7,500.
Real GDP in 1998 is equal to Bananalands 1998 output valued at base-year prices
(1997 prices). To value the 1998 output at 1997 prices, expenditure on bananas
is 1,100 bunches @ £2 a bunch (which is £2,200), expenditure on sunscreen is 525
bottles @ £10 a bottle (which is £5,250). So real GDP in 1998 is £7,450.
9b. The growth rate of real GDP in 1998 is 6.43 percent.
The growth rate equals the increase in real GDP from 1997 to 1998 expressed as a
percentage of real GDP in 1997. That is, the growth rate equals (£7,450 -
£7,000)/£7,000, which is 6.43 percent.
9c. The GDP deflator in 1998 is 100.67.
GDP deflator equals GDP in 1998 divided by real GDP in 1998, multiplied by 100.
GDP deflator equals (£7,500/£7,450) ΄ 100 = 100.67.
1a. Unemployment rate is 6.3 percent.
The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labour force that is unemployed.
The labour force is the sum of the people unemployed and the people employed.
The labour force is 29,049,000 and the number of people employed is 27,227,000,
so the number of people who are unemployed equals 29,049,000 minus 27,227,000,
which is 1,822,000.
The unemployment rate equals (the number of people unemployed divided by the
labour force) multiplied by 100. That is, (1,822,000/29,049,000)x100, which is
6.3 percent.
1b. The labour force participation rate (or sometimes known as economic activity rate) is 62.8 percent.
The labour force participation rate is the percentage of the working-age
population that is in the labour force. The working-age population is 46,253,000
and the labour force is 29,049,000, so the labour force participation rate
equals (29,049,000/46,253,000)x100, which equals 62.8 percent.
1c. The employment-to-population ratio is 58.7 percent.
The employment-to-population ratio is the percentage of the people of working
age who have jobs. The employment-to-population ratio is the number of people
employed divided by the working-age population all multiplied by 100. The
employment-to-population ratio is (27,227,000/46,253,000)x100, which is 58.9
percent.
3. Unemployment increased by 51,000. The number of discouraged workers has
increased.
During 1999, employment in the UK increased by 333,000 and the labour force
increased by 307,000. The number of unemployed is calculated as the labour force
minus the number employed. When the labour force increased by 307,000 and
employment increased by 333,000, unemployment decreased by 26,000.
Discouraged workers are people who leave the labour force temporarily during a
recession and re-enter the labour force and become job seekers during an
expansion. To measure the number of discouraged workers, we need to know about
new entrants and retirements. Because the labour force increased by more than
the increase in the working-age population, it is likely that the number of
discouraged workers decreased.
5a. The number of job losers probably decreased. The number of job leavers
probably did not change much.
The decrease in the unemployment rate is an indication that the economy was in
an expansion, and normally, in an expansion, the number of job losers decreases
but the number of job leavers does not change much.
5b. Labour force entrants and re-entrants probably increased.
In an expansion, discouraged workers re-enter the labour force. So it is likely
that entrants and re-entrants increased.
7a. The labour force in July is 15,344,000. It is the number employed plus the
number unemployed.
7b. The unemployment rate in July is 10.1 percent. It is the number unemployed
as a percentage of the labour force.
7c. The working-age population is 22,729,000. It is the sum of the labour force
and the number of people not in the labour force.
7d. The employment-to-population ratio is 60.7. It is the number employed as a
percentage of the working-age population.
7e. The number of people who are unemployed at the end of August is 1,546,995.
It equals the number unemployed in July plus job losers, job leavers, entrants,
and reentrants minus hires, recalls, and withdrawals.
7f. The number of people who are employed at the end of August is 13,796,971.
It equals the number employed in July minus job losers and job leavers plus
hires and recalls.
7g. The labour force at the end of August is 15,343,966. It equals the number
employed plus the number unemployed.
7h. The unemployment rate at the end of August is 10.1 percent. It equals the
number unemployed as a percentage of the labour force.
7i. The employment-to-population ratio at the end of August is 58.9. It equals
the number employed as a percentage of the working-age population. The
working-age population is the labour force multiplied by 100 and divided by the
labour force participation rate.
9. At the peak of a business cycle, the labour force participation rate is
high, employment is high, the unemployment rate is low, the duration of
unemployment is low, and fewer workers are discouraged.
1a. A deep recession in the world economy will decrease real GDP, and the price
level will fall. A sharp rise in oil prices will decrease real GDP, and the
price level will rise. When businesses expect huge losses in the near future,
real GDP will decrease and the price level will fall.
(i) A deep recession in the world economy will decrease world income, which in
turn will reduce Toughtimes' exports of goods and services. Toughtimes'
aggregate demand curve will shift leftward. In Toughtimes, real GDP will
decrease and the price level will fall.
(ii) A sharp rise in oil prices will decrease short-run aggregate supply and
shift the short-run aggregate supply curve leftward. In Toughtimes, the real GDP
will decrease and the price level will rise.
(iii) When businesses expect huge losses in the near future, they will reduce
investment now. Aggregate demand will decrease, and the aggregate demand curve
will shift leftward. In Toughtimes, real GDP will decrease and the price level
will fall.
1b. Real GDP will decrease and the price level might rise, fall, or stay the
same.
In 1a, each of the events decreases real GDP, so together they will decrease
real GDP. But the recession and the expected business losses will lead to a fall
in the price level, while the sharp rise in the oil price will lead to a rise in
the price level. So together, the price level might rise, fall, or stay the
same.
1c. To increase aggregate demand, the government might increase its
expenditures or cut taxes and the central bank might increase the quantity of
money and decrease interest rates. These policies will increase real GDP.
3a. To plot the aggregate demand curve, plot the price and the quantity of real
GDP demanded. To plot the short-run aggregate supply curve, plot the price and
the quantity of real GDP supplied in the short-run.
3b. Real GDP is 400 billion, and the price level is 100.
Short-run macroeconomic equilibrium occurs at the intersection of the aggregate
demand curve and the short-run aggregate supply curve.
3c. The long-run aggregate supply curve is a vertical line at real GDP of 500
billion.
5. Real GDP increases to 450 billion, and the price level rises to 110.
Aggregate demand increases by 100 billion at each value of the price level, and
the aggregate demand curve shifts rightward by 100 billion. The new aggregate
demand curve intersects the short-run aggregate supply curve at a real GDP of
E450 billion and a price level of 110.
7. Real GDP decreases to 350 billion, and the price level rises to 110.
Short-run aggregate supply decreases by 100 billion at each value of the price
level and the short-run aggregate supply curve shifts leftward by 100 billion.
The new short-run aggregate supply curve intersects the aggregate demand curve
at a real GDP of 350 billion and a price level of 110.
9a. The equilibrium point is point c.
The aggregate demand curve is the red curve AD1. The short-run aggregate supply
curve is the blue curve SAS0. These curves intersect at point c.
9b. The equilibrium point is point d.
The short-run aggregate supply curve is the red curve SAS1. The aggregate demand
curve is now the red curve AD1 These curves intersect at point d.
9c. Aggregate demand increases if (1) expected future incomes, inflation, or
profits increase; (2) the government increases its expenditures or reduces
taxes; (3) the central bank increases the quantity of money and decrease
interest rates; or (4) the exchange rate decreases or foreign income increases.
9d. Short-run aggregate supply decreases if resource prices increase.
1a. The marginal propensity to consume is 0.5.
The marginal propensity to consume is the fraction of a change in disposable
income that is consumed. On Heron Island, when disposable income increases by
10 million per year, consumption expenditure increases by 5 million per year.
The marginal propensity to consume is 0.5.
1b. The table that shows Heron Islands saving lists disposable income from
zero to 40 million in increments of 10 milion. Against each level of disposable income are the amounts of saving, which equal disposable income minus consumption expenditure. These amounts run from 5 million at zero disposable income to 15 milion at a disposable income of 40 million. For each increase in disposable income of 1, saving increases by 50 cents.
1c. Marginal propensity to save is 0.5
The marginal propensity to consume plus the marginal propensity to save equals
1. Because consumption expenditure and saving exhaust disposable income, 0.5 of
each euro increase in disposable income is consumed and the remaining part
(0.5) is saved.
3a. Autonomous expenditure is 2.0 billion
Autonomous expenditure is expenditure that does not depend on real GDP.
Autonomous expenditure equals the value of aggregate planned expenditure when
real GDP is zero.
3b. Marginal propensity to consume is 0.6
When the country has no imports or exports and no income taxes, the slope of the
AE curve equals the marginal propensity to consume. When income increases from 0
to 6 billion, aggregate planned expenditure increases from 2 billion to 5.6
billion. That is, when real GDP increases by 6 billion, aggregate planned
expenditure increases by 3.6 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is
3.6 billion/6 billion, which is 0.6.
3c. Equilibrium expenditure is 5 billion.
Equilibrium expenditure is the level of aggregate expenditure at which aggregate
planed expenditure equals real GDP. In terms of the graph, equilibrium
expenditure occurs at the intersection of the AE curve and the 45° line. The
equation to the AE curve is AE = 2 + 0.6y where y is real GDP. The equation to
the 45° line is AE = y. The AE curve intersects the 45° line at a real GDP of E5
billion.
3d. Unplanned inventory investment is negative.
When real GDP is 4 billion, aggregate planned expenditure exceeds real GDP, so
firms sell more than they produce. Inventories run down.
3e. Firms are accumulating inventories. That is, unplanned inventory investment
is positive.
When real GDP is 6 billion, aggregate planned expenditure is less than real
GDP, so firms cannot sell all that they produce. Inventories pile up.
3f. The multiplier is 2.5.
The multiplier equals 1/(1 - MPC). The marginal propensity to consume is 0.6, so
the multiplier equals 1/(1 - 0.6), which equals 2.5.
5a. The consumption function is C = 100 + 0.9(Y T).
The consumption function is the relationship between consumption expenditure and
disposable income, other things remaining the same.
5b. The equation to the AE curve is:
AE = 600 + 0.9Y,where Y is real GDP.
Aggregate planned expenditure is the sum of consumption expenditure, investment,
government expenditure, and net exports. Using the symbol AE for aggregate
planned expenditure, aggregate planned expenditure is:
AE = 100 + 0.9(Y 400) + 460 + 400
AE = 100 + 0.9Y 360 + 460 + 400
AE = 600 + 0.9Y
5c. Equilibrium expenditure is 6,000 billion.
Equilibrium expenditure is the level of aggregate expenditure that occurs when
aggregate planned expenditure equals real GDP. That is,
AE = 600 + 0.9Y
and
AE = Y
Solving these two equations for Y gives equilibrium expenditure of 6,000
billion.
5d. Equilibrium real expenditure decreases by 1,000 billion, and the
multiplier is 10.
The multiplier equals 1/(1 - the slope of the AE curve). The equation to the AE
curve tells us that the slope of the AE curve is 0.9. So the multiplier is 1/(1
- 0.9), which is 10.
The change in equilibrium expenditure equals the change in investment multiplied
by 10.
7a. The quantity demanded increases by 1,000 billion.
The increase in investment shifts the aggregate demand curve rightward by the
change in investment times the multiplier. The multiplier is 10 and the change
in investment is 100 billion, so the aggregate demand curve shifts rightward by
1,000 billion.
7b. In the short-run, real GDP increases by less than 1,000 billion
Real GDP is determined by the intersection of the AD curve and the SAS curve. In
the short run, the price level will rise and real GDP will increase but by an
amount less than the shift of the AD curve.
7c. In the long-run, real GDP will equal potential GDP, so real GDP does not
increase.
Real GDP is determined by the intersection of the AD curve and the SAS curve.
After the initial increase in investment, money wages increase, the SAS curve
shifts leftward, and in the long run, real GDP moves back to potential GDP.
7d. In the short run, the price level rises.
7e. In the long run, the price level rises.
1a. Equilibrium expenditure decreases by 100 billion.
The government expenditures multiplier is the amount by which a change in
government expenditures on goods and services is multiplied to determine the
change in equilibrium expenditure that results. Zap has no induced taxes or
imports, so the government expenditures multiplier is 1/(1 - MPC), which equals
10. The multiplier tells us that when government expenditures decrease by 10
billion, equilibrium expenditure decreases by 10 times as much or 100 billion.
1b. The government expenditures multiplier is 10.
1c. Equilibrium expenditure increases by 90 billion.
The autonomous tax multiplier equals -MPC/(1 - MPC), which is -9. That is, when
autonomous taxes are changed by 10 billion, equilibrium expenditure changes by
-9 times the change in autonomous taxes. A cut in autonomous taxes of 10
billion will increase equilibrium expenditure by 90 billion.
1d. The autonomous tax multiplier is -9.
1e. Equilibrium expenditure decreases by 10 billion.
The decrease in government expenditures decreases equilibrium expenditure by
100 billion and the cut in taxes increases equilibrium expenditure by 90
billion. So together, equilibrium expenditure decreases by 10 billion.
3a. The quantity of real GDP demanded increases by 100 billion.
The government expenditures multiplier tells us that when government
expenditures increase by 10 billion, equilibrium expenditure increases by 10
times as much, or 100 billion. At the price level 100, the quantity of real GDP
demanded increases by an amount equal to the change in equilibrium expenditure.
That is, the quantity of real GDP demanded increases by 100 billion.
3b. The aggregate demand curve shifts rightward by 100 billion at each price
level.
The AE curve shifts upward by 10 billion, equilibrium expenditure increases by
100 billion, and the AD curve shifts rightward by 100 billion.
3c. In the short run, real GDP increases by less than the 100 billion increase
in the quantity of real GDP demanded.
In the short run, short-run aggregate supply and aggregate demand determine real
GDP. Because the short-run aggregate supply curve slopes upward, the price level
rises and real GDP increases but by less than 100 billion.
3d. In the long run, the increase in real GDP will be zero. Real GDP will
return to potential GDP.
In the short run, real GDP exceeds potential GDP and wage rates will start to
rise. The short-run aggregate supply will begin to decrease and the price level
will rise. The short-run aggregate supply will continue to decrease and the
price level will continue to rise until real GDP equals potential GDP.
3e. The price level rises.
In the short run, aggregate demand and short-run aggregate supply determine the
price level. Because the short-run aggregate supply curve slopes upward and
because aggregate demand increases, the price level rises.
3f. The price level rises.
In the long run, aggregate demand and long-run aggregate supply determine the
price level. The short-run aggregate supply curve shifts leftward because the
money wage rate rises. Because the long-run aggregate supply curve is vertical
and because aggregate demand increases, the price level rises. And it rises by
more in the long run than it does in the short run.
5a. The government budget balance is zero.
The government's revenues equal its outlays, so its budget is balanced.
5b. Dreamland does not have a structural or a cyclical deficit.
Because at potential GDP, the budget is balanced, Dreamland does not have a
structural surplus or deficit. Because real GDP equals potential GDP, Dreamland
does not have a cyclical surplus or deficit.
5c. The budget balance is a deficit of 40 million.
At a real GDP of 30 million, revenues equal 80 million and outlays equal 120
million, so the budget is in deficit. The size of the deficit is 40 million.
5d. Dreamland does not have a structural deficit, but it does have a cyclical
deficit of 40 million.
Because at potential GDP, the budget is balanced, Dreamland does not have a
structural surplus or deficit. Because real GDP is less than potential GDP and
it has a deficit, Dreamland's deficit is a cyclical deficit. The cyclical
deficit is 40 million.
5e. Dreamland does not have a structural deficit but it does have a cyclical
surplus of 40 million.
Because at potential GDP, the budget is balanced, Dreamland does not have a
structural surplus or deficit. Because real GDP exceeds potential GDP and it has
a surplus, Dreamland's surplus is a cyclical surplus. The cyclical surplus is
40 million.
1. Money in the UK includes the notes and coins you keep in your wallet and the coins in the public phone. Money is composed of currency outside the banks and deposits at banks and other financial institutions. Currency inside the cash machines, Visa cards, cheques, and loans are not money.
3. M1 increases by £1,000; M4 does not change.
M1 is the sum of currency outside the banks plus demand deposits at banks and building societies that are owned by individuals and businesses. M4 is the sum of M1 plus personal and nonpersonal time deposits at chartered banks plus all types of savings deposits at building societies. The withdrawal of £1,000
from a savings account leaves M4 unchanged because the £1,000 goes into M1 types of money, which is part of M4. The £50 held as cash and the £950 held in a demand deposit account increase M1 by £1,000.
5a. The balance sheet has the following assets: Reserves, £250 million; Loans,
£1,000 million; Other assets, £1,250 million. It has the following liabilities:
Deposits, £2,000 million; Other liabilities, £500 million.
5b. The reserve ratio is 12.5 percent.
The reserve ratio is the percentage of deposits that are held as reserves.
Reserves are £250 million and deposits are £2,000, so the reserve ratio is 12.5
percent.
5c. The deposit multiplier is 8.
The deposit multiplier equals 1/(desired reserve ratio). The desired reserve
ratio is 12.5, so the deposit multiplier is 8.
7a. People buy bonds, and the interest rate falls.
7b. People sell bonds, and the interest rate rises.
7c. People neither buy nor sell bonds, and the interest rate remains constant
at 4 percent a year.
With real GDP of 20 billion (Y1 in the spreadsheet), column C shows the demand
for money schedule. The quantity of money supplied is 3 billion, so the
equilibrium interest rate is 4 percent a year.
If the interest rate exceeds 4 percent a year, people are holding more money
than they demand. So they try to decrease the amount of money held by buying
bonds. The prices of bonds rise, and the interest rate falls.
If the interest rate is less than 4 percent a year, people are holding less
money than they demand. So they try to increase the amount of money held by
selling bonds. The prices of bonds fall, and the interest rate rises.
If the interest rate equals 4 percent a year, people are holding exactly the
quantity of money that they demand. So they take no actions to try to change the
amount of money held. The interest rate remains constant.
9a. The interest rate rises to 5 percent a year.
9b. The interest rate falls to 3 percent a year.
When real GDP increases in an expansion to 30 billion (Y2 in the spreadsheet),
column D shows the demand for money schedule. The quantity of money supplied is
3 billion, so the equilibrium interest rate is 5 percent a year.
When real GDP decreases in a recession to 10 billion (Y0 in the spreadsheet),
column B shows the demand for money schedule. The quantity of money supplied is
3 billion, so the equilibrium interest rate is 3 percent a year.
11a.The money supply curve is vertical at 100 billion 1992 yaks.
When the real money supply is 100 billion 1990 yaks, the equilibrium interest
rate is 3 percent a year at the intersection of the demand for money and supply
of money curves.
11b.Must increase the quantity of real money by 50 billion 1992 yaks.
When the quantity of real money increases to 150 billion 1992 yaks, the
equilibrium interest rate falls to 2 percent a year.
13a. During the expansion phase of the cycle, the interest rate falls. When the
interest rate falls, consumption expenditure increases, investment increases,
the exchange rate falls, and net exports increase.
13b. During the recession phase of the cycle, the interest rate rises. When the
interest rate rises, consumption expenditure decreases, investment decreases,
the exchange rate rises, and net exports decrease.
1a. The monetary base is 45 billion.
The monetary base is the sum of the central banks notes outside the bank,
banks deposits at the central bank, and coins held by households, firms, and
banks. There are 30 billion in notes held by households and firms, banks
deposits at the central bank are 10 billion (2/3 of 15 billion), the banks
hold other reserves of 5 billion (which are notes), and there are no coins. The
monetary base is 45 billion.
1b. The quantity of money is 330 billion.
In Nocoin, deposits are 300 billion and currency is 30 billion, so the
quantity of money is 330 billion.
1c. The banks reserve ratio is 5 percent.
The banks reserve ratio is the percent of deposits that is held as reserves. In
Nocoin, deposits are 300 billion and reserves are 15 billion, so the reserve
ratio equals (15 billion/300 billion)x100, which is 5 percent.
1d. The currency drain is 9.09 percent.
The currency drain is the percent of the quantity of money that is held as
currency by households and firms. In Nocoin, deposits are 300 billion and
currency is 30 billion, so the quantity of money is 330 billion. The currency
drain equals (30 billion/330 billion)x100, which is 9.09 percent.
3. The money supply increases to 337.33 billion.
The money supply increases by the change in the monetary base multiplied by the
money multiplier. The money multiplier is the ratio of the money supply to the
monetary base, which equals 330 billion divided by 45 billion, which equals
7.33.
So when the monetary base increases by 1 billion, the money supply increases by
7.33 billion. Initially, the money supply was 330 billion, so the new money
supply is 337.33 billion.
The change in the money supply is not equal to the change in the monetary base
because of the multiplier effect. The open market operation increases bank
reserves and creates excess reserves which banks use to make new loans. New
loans are used to make payments and some of these loans are placed on deposit in
banks. The increase in bank deposits increases banks reserves and increases
desired reserves. But the banks now have excess reserves which they loan out and
the process repeats until excess reserves have been eliminated.
5a. The price level is 130 and real GDP is 200 billion.
The intersection of the aggregate demand curve, AD, and the short-run aggregate
supply curve, SASA, determine the price level and real GDP.
5b. Freezone has an unemployment problem.
Potential GDP is 300 billion, but actual real GDP is 200 billion. When real
GDP is less than potential GDP, resources are not fully employed. Unemployment
exceeds that at full employment.
5c. Eventually, the real GDP will increase and full employment will be
restored. The price level will fall.
With unemployment exceeding the natural rate of unemployment, the money wage
rate will eventually fall. The SAS curve will shift rightward, the price level
will fall, and real GDP will gradually increase to potential GDP. At potential
GDP, the economy is at full employment. This automatic adjustment will take a
long time to occur.
5d. By buying securities on the open market, the central bank will increase the
money supply, increase aggregate demand, and return the economy to full
employment more quickly.
Currently real GDP is less than potential GDP and the economy is at a below
full-employment equilibrium. If the central bank buys securities on the open
market, then the quantity of money will increase and the aggregate demand curve
will shift rightward. The economy returns to full employment but the price level
will rise. If this process takes some time, the economy will experience
inflation.
7a. If the central bank buys securities on the open market, the money supply
increases, aggregate demand increases, real GDP increases, and the price level
rises.
When the central bank buys securities on the open market, the quantity of money
increases, the interest rate falls, so consumption, investment, and net exports
increase. Aggregate demand increases, and the aggregate demand curve shifts
rightward. Real GDP increases and the price level rises.
7b. If the central bank sells securities on the open market, the money supply
decreases, aggregate demand decreases, real GDP decreases, and the price level
falls.
When the central bank sells securities on the open market, the quantity of money
decreases, the interest rate rise, so consumption, investment, and net exports
decrease. Aggregate demand decreases, and the aggregate demand curve shifts
leftward. Real GDP decreases and the price level falls.
7c. To return the economy to full employment, the central bank would sell
securities on the open market.
Currently real GDP is greater than potential GDP and the economy is at an above
full-employment equilibrium. If the central bank sells securities on the open
market, then the quantity of money decreases and the aggregate demand curve
shifts leftward. The price level falls and the economy returns to full
employment.
9a. On the average, the interest rate in Minland is 3 percent a year.
The money supply curve is vertical at a quantity of 150 billion. On the
average, the demand for money curve is MDA. The intersection of the demand for
money curve, MDA and the money supply curve determine the interest rate.
9b. The interest rate ranges from 2 percent a year to 4 percent a year.
The demand for money fluctuates around an average level of MDA to a high of MDB
and a low of MDC. As the demand for money fluctuates, the interest rate
fluctuates. The interest rate is 2 percent a year when the demand for money is
MDC, 3 percent a year when the demand for money is MDA, and 4 percent a year
when the demand for money is MDB.
9c. As the demand for money fluctuates, the interest rate changes, which will
lead to changes in real GDP and the price level.
When the demand for money increases, the interest rate rises and aggregate
demand decreases. With aggregate demand decreasing, real GDP decreases and the
price level falls.
When the demand for money decreases, the interest rate falls, and aggregate
demand increases. With aggregate demand increasing, real GDP increases and the
price level rises.
1a. A decrease in government expenditures leads to a decrease in aggregate
demand, which in turn sets up a process in which real GDP starts to decrease and
the price level starts to fall.
The decrease in government expenditures has a multiplier effect on aggregate
demand. Aggregate demand decreases and shifts the AD curve in figure 27.1(a)
leftward. Real GDP begins to decrease and the price level starts to fall towards
the new equilibrium.
1b. Real GDP decreases and the interest rate falls.
In the first round, real GDP begins to decrease and the price level begins to
fall. In the second round, as real GDP decreases the demand for money decreases.
As the price level falls, the quantity of real money increases. As a result, the
interest rate falls. The fall in the interest rate limits the decrease in real
GDP.
1c. Through the second round, real GDP decreases and the price level falls
until the new equilibrium is reached. As real GDP decreases, the demand for
money decreases and the money demand curve in figure 27.1(b), MD, shifts
leftward. The interest rate falls. With a given quantity of nominal money, the
falling price level increases the quantity of real money. In figure 27.1(b), the
supply curve of real money, MS, shifts rightward and the interest rate falls
further. As the interest rate falls, interest-sensitive expenditure increases.
The increase in interest-sensitive expenditure increases aggregate demand and
the aggregate demand curve starts to shift rightward. But aggregate demand
increases by less than the initial decrease in aggregate demand. So at the new
equilibrium, aggregate demand is less than initially.
Comparing the final equilibrium with the initial equilibrium, the decrease in
government expenditures on goods and services has lead to a decrease in real
GDP, a fall in the price level, and a fall in the interest rate.
3a. A decrease in the money supply raises the interest rate and decreases
interest-sensitive expenditure. The decrease in interest-sensitive expenditure
has a multiplier effect on aggregate demand. Aggregate demand decreases. Real
GDP and the price level begin to decrease.
A decrease in the money supply with a constant price level decreases the real
money supply and shifts the real money supply curve in figure 27.1(b) leftward.
The interest rate rises. The higher interest rate decreases interest-sensitive
expenditure in figure 27.1(c). The decrease in interest-sensitive expenditure
decreases aggregate demand and shifts the AD curve leftward in figure 27.1(a).
Real GDP begins to decrease and the price level begins to fall towards the new
equilibrium.
3b. Real GDP decreases and the interest rate rises.
In the first round, real GDP begins to decrease and the price level begins to
fall. In the second round, as real GDP decreases the demand for money decreases.
As the price level falls, the quantity of real money increases. As a result, the
interest rate falls. The fall in the interest rate limits the decrease in
interest-sensitive expenditure and limits the decrease in real GDP.
3c. In the second round, the decreasing real GDP decreases the demand for
money. The money demand curve in figure 27.1(b) shifts leftward and the interest
rate falls. The falling price level increases in the supply of real money and
the real money supply curve shifts rightward. The interest rate falls further.
As the interest rate falls, interest-sensitive expenditure increases. The
increase in interest-sensitive expenditure increases aggregate demand and the
aggregate demand curve starts to shift rightward. But aggregate demand increases
by less than the initial decrease in aggregate demand. So at the new
equilibrium, aggregate demand is less than initially.
5a. An increase in government expenditures on goods and services has a larger
effect on real GDP in Alpha.
The first round effects are the same in Alpha and Beta. In the second round, the
increasing real GDP increases the demand for money. The demand for money curves
in Alpha and in Beta shift rightward. In both countries, the interest rate
rises, but it rises by a greater amount in Beta. The higher interest rate
decreases interest-sensitive expenditure by more in Beta than in Alpha, and in
Beta the aggregate demand curve shifts further to the left. Real GDP increases
by a greater amount in Alpha than in Beta.
5b. The crowding-out effect is weaker in Alpha.
The expansionary fiscal policies in Alpha and Beta increase the interest rates.
As the interest rate rises, the interest-sensitive components of aggregate
expenditure, including investment, decrease. The interest rate rises by more in
Beta than in Alpha, so the decrease in investment will be greater in Beta than
in Alpha. Beta will experience more crowding out.
5c. A change in the money supply has a larger effect on equilibrium real GDP in
Beta.
When the money supply increases, the interest rate falls by a greater amount in
Beta than in Alpha. The lower interest rate in Beta increases interest-sensitive
expenditure by a greater amount than in Alpha and shifts the aggregate demand
curve further to the right than in Alpha. Equilibrium real GDP increases by more
in Beta than in Alpha.
5d. Beta is closer to the monetarist extreme. Alpha is closer to the Keynesian
extreme.
Extreme monetarism hypothesizes that a change in the money supply has a large
effect on aggregate demand. Beta has a money demand curve that is less sensitive
to the interest rate than Alpha. A change in the money supply changes the
interest rate and aggregate demand by a relatively large amount in Beta.
Extreme Keynesianism hypothesizes that a change in the money supply has no
effect on aggregate demand. Alpha has a money demand curve that is more
sensitive to the interest rate than Beta. A change in the money supply changes
the interest rate by a small amount and aggregate demand by a relatively small
amount in Alpha.
7a. An increase in government expenditures and a decrease in taxes are
expansionary fiscal policies. Aggregate demand increases in the first round.
Real GDP and the price level begin to increase. In the second round, the
increasing real GDP increases the demand for money and the interest rate rises.
The rising price level decreases the supply of real money and increases the
interest rate further. Interest-sensitive expenditure decreases and limits the
increase in real GDP. The decrease in interest-sensitive expenditure includes a
decrease in investment and net exports.
An increase in the money supply lowers the interest rate, increases
interest-sensitive expenditure and increases aggregate demand in the first
round. Real GDP and the price level begin to increase. In the second round,
increasing real GDP increases the demand for money and the interest rate rises.
The rising price level decreases the supply of real money and the interest rate
rises further. The increase in interest-sensitive expenditure limits the
increase in real GDP. The resulting increase in interest-sensitive expenditure
includes an increase in investment and net exports.
7b. The expansionary fiscal policies raise the interest rate and the
interest-sensitive expenditure component of aggregate demand decrease. The
exchange rate rises, exports decrease, imports increase, and net exports
decrease.
An increase in the money supply lowers the interest rate and the
interest-sensitive expenditure component of aggregate demand increase. The
exchange rate falls, exports increase, imports decrease, and net exports
increase.
7c. All policies increase real GDP and raise the price level.
7d. The best policy is to increase the money supply.
Increasing the money supply results in a lower the interest rate and lowers the
exchange rate. The lower interest rate increases investment and lowers the
exchange rate increasing net exports.
9a. A combination of an increase in the money supply and a decrease in
government expenditures.
9b. An increase in the money supply lowers the interest rate and increases
interest-sensitive expenditure including investment. The aggregate demand curve
shifts rightward. A decrease in government expenditures decreases aggregate
demand and shifts the aggregate demand curve leftward. Real GDP decreases, the
interest rate decreases, and interest-sensitive expenditure, including
investment, increases. If the decrease in government expenditures is of the
correct magnitude, the leftward shift of the aggregate demand curve will offset
the rightward shift created by the increase in the money supply. The price level
will remain the same.
9c. The lower interest rate will increase investment and consumption
expenditure and the lower exchange rate will increase exports.
9d. In the short run, real GDP and the price level do not change. The aggregate
demand curve remains the sameonly the composition of aggregate demand changes.
In the long run, the increase in investment will encourage economic growth. Real
GDP will increase and the price level will remain the same.
1a. An increase in the quantity of money, an increase in government
expenditures, a tax cut, an increase in exports.
Anything that increases aggregate demand can set off a demand-pull inflation.
But to sustain such an inflation, the quantity of money must keep increasing.
1b. Starting out on AD0 and SAS0, the price level is 120 and real GDP is at
potential GDP of 7 billion. Aggregate demand increases and the AD curve shifts
rightward to AD1. The price level rises and real GDP increases to the
intersection of AD1 and SAS0. There is now an inflationary gap.
1c. Starting out on AD1 and SAS0 with an inflationary gap, the money wage rate
rises and short-run aggregate supply decreases. The SAS curve starts to shift
leftward toward SAS1. The price level keeps rising, but real GDP now decreases.
The process now repeats. AD shifts to AD2, an inflationary gap opens again, the
money wage rate rises again, and the SAS curve shifts toward SAS2.
3a. The quantity of money is 40 million.
Because MV=PY, we know that M=PY/V. With P=200, Y=400 million, and V=20, M=40
million.
3b. The quantity of money is 48 million.
Money grows by 20 percent, which is 8 million. So the quantity of money
increases from 40 million to 48 million.
3c. The price level is 240.
Because the quantity theory holds and because the factors that influence real
GDP have not changed, the price level rises by the same percentage as the
increase in money, which is 20 percent. The price level rises from 200 to 240.
3d. Real GDP is 400 billion.
Because the factors that influence real GDP have not changed, real GDP is
unchanged. It remains at 400 billion.
3e. Velocity of circulation is 20.
Because the factors that influence velocity have not changed, velocity is
unchanged. It remains at 20.
5a. An anticipated increase in the quantity of money, an increase in government
expenditures, a tax cut, an increase in exports.
Anything that increases aggregate demand can set off an anticipated inflation as
long as the event is anticipated. But to sustain such an anticipated inflation,
the quantity of money must keep increasing along its anticipated path.
5b. Starting out on AD0 and SAS0, the price level is 120 and real GDP is at
potential GDP of 7 billion. Aggregate demand increases, and the AD curve shifts
rightward to AD1. The increase in aggregate demand is anticipated so the money
wage rate rises and the SAS curve shifts to SAS1. The price level rises, and
real GDP remains at potential GDP.
5c. Starting out on AD1 and SAS1, a further anticipated increase in aggregate
demand occurs. The AD curve shifts to AD2, and because the increase in aggregate
demand is anticipated, the money wage rate rises again and the SAS curve shifts
to SAS2. Again, the price level rises and real GDP remains at potential GDP.
7a. If the natural unemployment rate and the expected inflation rate remain
constant between 1999 and 2003, the SRPC is linear and passes through the data
points listed in the table provided. Note that one of these points is the
natural rate of unemployment (4 percent) and the expected inflation rate (6
percent). The LRPC is vertical at an unemployment rate of 4 percent.
7b. If the actual inflation rate rises from 6 percent to 8 percent a year, the
unemployment rate decreases from 4 percent to 3 percent. This change would occur
if aggregate demand were expected to increase.
9a. Both the inflation rate and the unemployment rate have increased. So the
expected inflation rate has increased and the natural rate of unemployment might
have increased (but has not definitely increased). Any of the events that can
increase the expected inflation rate might have occurred. Most likely, the
expected growth rate of the money supply has increased. If the natural rate of
unemployment has not increased, the economy is in a recession, despite the fact
that the inflation rate has increased.
9b. If point a is a long-run equilibrium, the LRPC is vertical at an
unemployment rate of 4 percent. The SRPC slopes downward and passes through
point a. If point a is not a long-run equilibrium, the SRPC still passes through
point a but the LRPC is vertical at whatever unemployment rate is the natural
rate.
9c. If point d is a long-run equilibrium, the LRPC is vertical at an
unemployment rate of 8 percent. The SRPC slopes downward and passes through
point d. If point d is not a long-run equilibrium, the SRPC still passes through
point d but the LRPC is vertical at whatever unemployment rate is the natural
rate.
1a. The graph plots leisure on the x-axis and real GDP on the y-axis. As
leisure increases from zero to 12 hours a day, real GDP decreases from £30 to £0
a day.
1b. The table replaces leisure with labour and labour equals 12 hours a day
minus leisure hours. The graph plots labour on the x-axis and real GDP on the
y-axis. As labour increases from zero to 12 hours a day, real GDP increases from
0 to 30 a day.
1c. When labour increases from 0 to 2 hours a day, the marginal product of
labour is 5. When labour increases from 2 to 4 hours a day, the marginal
product of labour is 4. When labour increases from 4 to 6 hours a day, the
marginal product of labour is 3. When labour increases from 6 to 8 hours a day,
the marginal product of labour is 2. When labour increases from 8 to 10 hours a
day, the marginal product of labour is 1.When labour increases from 10 to 12
hours a day, the marginal product of labour is 0.
Marginal product is the change in real GDP divided by the change in labour
hours.
3a. The demand for labour schedule is the same as the marginal product of
labour schedule The marginal product of labour schedule is described in solution
1c. The marginal product must be aligned with the midpoint of the change in
labour. So, for example, the marginal product of 5 an hour is aligned with 1
hour of work at the midpoint between 0 and 2 hours.
The graph plots a marginal product of 5 at 1 hour and a marginal product of 1
at 9 hours of labour and is a straight line between these points. At 2 hours of
labour, the marginal product is 4.50.
3b. The table lists hours of labour from zero to 12 a day. Against each hour,
the wage rate at which Crusoe is willing to supply labour is 4.50 an hour.
Crusoes supply curve is horizontal at 4.50 an hour.
3c. The full-employment equilibrium real wage rate is 4.50 an hour, and the
quantity of labour employed is 2 hours a day.
The full-employment equilibrium real wage rate is 4.50 an hour because Crusoe
is willing to work any number of hours at this wage rate. The equilibrium level
of employment is 2 hours a day because this is the number of hours at which
Crusoes marginal product of labour is 4.50 an hour.
3d. Potential GDP is 10 a day.
Potential GDP is 10 a day because this quantity of real GDP is produced when
labour is 2 hours a day.
5a. The new production function table lists real GDP against labour hours. Real
GDP is 15 at 2 hours of labour, 27 at 4 hours, 36 at 6 hours, 42 at 8 hours,
45 at 10 hours, and 45 at 12 hours.
The new demand for labour schedule has labour of 2 hours at 6.75 and 9 hours at
1.50.
To calculate the new demand for labour schedule, calculate the new marginal
product (old marginal product multiplied by 1.5) at each level of employment.
5b. The full-employment equilibrium real wage rate is 4.50 an hour and the
quantity of labour employed is 5 hours a day.
The equilibrium level of employment is 5 hours a day because this is the number
of hours at which Crusoes marginal product of labour is 4.50 an hour.
5c. Potential GDP is 31.50 a day.
Potential GDP is 31.50 a day because this quantity of real GDP is produced when
labour is 5 hours a day.
5d. The increase in productivity shifts the production function upward by 50
percent. The marginal product of labour increases by 50 percent. Employment
increases and so does potential GDP.
7a. Real wage rate is 3 an hour and employment is 3,000 hours a day.
This wage rate and quantity of labour are at the intersection of the demand
curve and the supply curve in the figure.
7b. Potential GDP is 13,500 a day.
To calculate potential GDP, use the fact that the real wage rate on the demand
for labour curve is the marginal product of labour. Remember that it is plotted
midway between the initial and final level of real GDP from which it is
calculated. Do the marginal product calculation in reverse and obtain the level
of real GDP at 3,000 hours, which is 13,500 a day.
7c. The natural rate of unemployment is 25 percent.
The natural rate of unemployment occurs at full employment when job search is
1,000 hours. Employment is 3,000 hours, and job search, which is unemployment,
is 1,000 hours. The labour force (employment plus unemployment) is 4,000 hours.
The natural rate of unemployment is 25 percent (1,000/4,000 multiplied by 100).
1. The economy dos not conform to the one-third rule. It conforms to a
one-half rule.
In this economy, an x percent increase in the capital stock per hour of work
leads to a 0.5x percent increase in real GDP per hour of work. You can confirm
this fact by calculating the percentage change in capital and real GDP at each
of the levels provided in the table and then dividing the percentage change in
real GDP by the percentage change in capital. For example, when capital
increases by 100 percent from £10 to £20, real GDP increases by 50 percent from
£3.80 to £5.70.
3a. Yes, Longland experiences diminishing returns.
Diminishing returns are present if the marginal product of capital diminishes as
capital increases, holding technology constant. You can calculate the marginal
product of capital from the schedule provided and see that it does diminish. The
increase in real GDP per hour of work that occurred in the question resulted
from an increase in capital and an advance in technology. We know this because
to produce £10.29 in 1999 would have required a capital stock of £60 per hour of
work, and in 2001, this output can be produced by a capital stock of £50. The
change in real GDP divided by the change in capital is not the marginal product
of labour because technology is not constant.
3b. The contribution of the change in capital is £1.04.
Along the productivity function, when capital per hour of work increases from
£40 to £50, real GDP per hour of work increases from £8.31 to £9.35, a
difference of £1.04. This number is also calculated as the percentage increase
in real GDP that is equal to one-half the percentage increase in capital.
3c. The contribution of technological change is £0.94.
This number is calculated as the change in real GDP minus the contribution of
the change in capital to the growth of productivity, which is £1.04.
5a. Employment is 6 billion hours per year and the real wage rate is £7 an
hour.
The labour market is n equilibrium at the real wage rate at which the quantity
demanded equals the quantity supplied. That real wage rate is £7 an hour.
5b. The real wage rate rises.
When the demand for labour increases, there is a shortage of labour at the
current wage rate. So the real wage rate rises.
5c. The population begins to grow.
The reason for the population growth is that the real wage rate exceeds the
subsistence level.
5d. Employment is 7 billion hours a year.
In long-run equilibrium, employment equals the quantity of labour demanded at
the subsistence real wage rate of £7 an hour. Only when the population has grown
by enough to make the quantity of labour supplied equal 7 billion hours a year
does the population stop growing.
7. When the demand for capital raises the real interest rate above the target
rate, the capital stock and real GDP begin to grow and keep on growing. In
contrast, in the neoclassical Marthas Island, as the capital stock grows, the
real interest rate falls (because of diminishing returns) and growth eventually
ends.
1a. Possible combinations are a or d, e or g, and i or k.
A Keynesian recession results from a decrease in investment caused by a decrease
in expected profit. In an extreme case, no prices change, so the move is to a,
e, and i. But a more general possibility is that the money wage rate doesnt
change but the price level falls, real wage rate rises, and the interest rate
falls. In this case, the move is to d, g, and k.
1b. The economy moves to d, g, and l.
A monetarist recession results from a decrease in the quantity of money. The
interest rate rises, and investment decreases. Aggregate demand decreases, but
the money wage rate doesnt change. Real GDP and the price level decrease, the
real wage rate rises, and employment decreases. The move is to d, g, and l.
1c. The economy moves to d, g, and i, k, or l.
1d. The economy moves to d, g, and i, k, or l.
Either type of rational expectations recession results from an unanticipated
decrease in aggregate demand. Any of several factors could initiate the decrease
in aggregate demand, and the interest rate could rise, fall, or remain constant.
Aggregate demand decreases, but the money wage rate either doesnt change or
doesnt change by enough to maintain full employment. So real GDP and the price
level decrease, the real wage rate rises, and employment decreases.
1e. The economy moves to c, e, g, or h, and k.
In a real business cycle recession, a decrease in productivity decreases the
demand for labour and capital. The interest rate and the real wage rate fall,
and investment and employment decrease. Aggregate demand and aggregate supply
decrease, so real GDP decreases but the price level might fall, rise, or remain
unchanged.
3. This recession is consistent with Keynesian or rational expectations
theories (see the solutions 1a, 1c, and 1d).
5. This recession is consistent with real business cycle theory (see the
solution 1e).
7. This recession is not consistent with any of the theories and is an
unlikely combination of events. The price level does not usually rise when the
real wage rate rises.
9. This recession is consistent with the real business cycle theory (see the
solution 1e).
11. This recession is consistent with monetarist theory (see the solution 1b).
13. This recession is not consistent with any of the theories and is an unlikely
combination of events. The real wage rate does not usually fall when the price
level falls.
1. Anything that slows investment in physical or human capital or slows the
pace of technological change will create a productivity growth slowdown. For the
factors at work during the UK productivity growth slowdown, review p. 687-688
of Chapter 30.
Improvements in incentives to invest in physical or human capital or to innovate
and speed up the pace of technological change will counteract a productivity
growth slowdown. See p.687-688 of Chapter 30 and pp. 738-739 of Chapter 32.
3a. Real GDP is 800 billion and the price level is 110.
These values are determined at the intersection of AD0 and SAS.
3b. Real GDP falls to 750 billion and the price level falls to 105. Then, as
aggregate demand returns to AD0, the price level and real GDP return to their
initial levels.
3c. Real GDP falls to 750 billion and the price level falls to 105. The
government increases aggregate demand to AD0, and the price level and real GDP
return to their initial levels. Aggregate demand then increases (because the
decrease is temporary), and real GDP rises above potential GDP. An inflationary
gap arises. The money wage rate rises and so does the price level. Real GDP
moves back toward potential GDP.
3d. Real GDP falls to 750 billion, and the price level falls to 105. The
economy is stuck at this point until the money wage rate falls, short-run
aggregate supply increases, and the economy moves back to potential GDP at an
even lower price level. This move will likely take a long time.
3e. Real GDP falls to 750 billion, and the price level falls to 105. The
government increases aggregate demand to AD0, and the price level and real GDP
return to their initial levels. Because the decrease in aggregate demand is
permanent, this is the end of the action.
5a. The economy might have got into its described state because of a
combination of rapid money supply growth (which brings inflation) and large
structural changes (which bring high unemployment and slow productivity growth).
5b. A slowdown in money growth will lower the inflation rate. Improvements in
incentives to invest in physical or human capital or to innovate and speed up
the pace of technological change will speed productivity growth.
5c. Study pp. 738-739 and pp. 746-750 for explanations of how these policy
actions work.
7a. These policy actions were part of a feedback rule. The actions were taken
because of the crises.
7b. The required domestic policies all decrease aggregate demand. They lower
real GDP and lower the price level (compared with what would have happened).
7c. A possible criticism, and one that some economists have made, is that the
countries should have adopted policies to expand real GDP even at the risk of a
rise in inflation, rather than adopt policies that decrease aggregate demand.
1a. 0.10 computer per TV set at 10 TV sets.
1b. 0.40 computer per TV set at 40 TV sets.
1c. 0.70 computer per TV set at 70 TV sets.
1d. The graph shows an upward-sloping line that passes through the three points
described in solutions 1a, 1b, and 1c.
The opportunity cost of a TV set is calculated as the decrease in the number of
computers produced divided by the increase in the number of TV sets produced as
we move along the PPF. The opportunity cost of a TV set increases as the
quantity of TV sets produced increases.
3a. Virtual Reality exports TV sets to Vital Signs.
At the no-trade production levels, the opportunity cost of a TV set is 0.10
computer in Virtual Reality and 0.30 computer in Vital Signs. Because it costs
less to produce a TV set in Virtual Reality, Vital Signs can import TV sets for
a lower price that it can produce them. And because a computer costs less in
Vital Signs than in Virtual Reality, Virtual Reality can import computers at a
lower cost than it can produce them.
3b. Virtual Reality increases the production of TV sets and Vital Signs
decreases the production of TV sets. Virtual Reality decreases the production of
computers and Vital Signs increases the production of computers.
Virtual Reality increases production of TV sets to export some to Vital Signs
and Vital Signs decreases production of TV sets because it now imports some from
Virtual Reality.
3c. Each country consumes more of at least one good and possibly of both goods.
Because each country has a lower opportunity cost than the other at producing
one of the goods, total production of both goods can increase.
3d. The price of a TV set is greater than 0.10 computer and less than 0.30
computer.
The price will be higher than the no-trade opportunity cost in Virtual Reality
(0.10 computer) and lower than the no-trade opportunity cost in Vital Signs
(0.30 computer).
5a. Free trade increases the production of at least one good (but not
necessarily both goods) in both cases because each country increases the
production of the good at which it has a comparative advantage.
5b. In problem 3, the price of a TV set rises in Virtual Reality. In problem 4,
it falls.
The reason is that in problem 3, Virtual Reality produces a small number of TV
sets with no trade and has the lower opportunity cost per TV set. But in problem
4, Virtual Reality produces a large number of TV sets with no trade and has the
higher opportunity cost per TV set. So in problem 3, Virtual Reality becomes an
exporter and increases production. The price of a TV set rises. In problem 4,
Virtual Reality becomes an importer and decreases production. The price of a TV
set falls.
5c. In problem 3, the price of a computer rises in Vital Signs. In problem 4,
it falls.
The reason is that in problem 3, Vital Signs produces a small number of
computers with no trade and has the lower opportunity cost per computer. But in
problem 4, Vital Signs produces a large number of computers with no trade and
has the higher opportunity cost per computer. So in problem 3, Vital Signs
becomes an exporter of computers and increases production. The price of a
computer rises. In problem 4, Vital Signs becomes an importer of computers and
decreases production. The price of a computer falls.
7a. The prices would be £90 per tonne in the importing country and £10 per
tonne in the exporting country.
These are the prices at which each country wishes to import and export a zero
quantity.
7b. The terms of trade are £50 per tonne.
This is the price at which the quantity demanded by the importer equals the
quantity supplied by the exporter.
7c. The quantity exported and imported is 40 million tonnes.
The quantity exported and imported is the equilibrium quantitythe quantity
demanded and supplied at the equilibrium price.
7d. The balance of trade is zero.
The balance of trade is zero because the value of soybeans imported equals the
value of soybeans exported.
9a. The price in the importing country is £60 per tonne.
The quantity demanded by the importer equals the quantity available under the
quota of 30 million tonnes at this price.
9b. The revenue from the quota is £600 million.
The price at which exporters are willing to sell 30 million tonnes is £40 a
tonne (read off the export supply curve). The price in the importing country is
£60 a tonne (read off the import demand curve), so the revenue from the quota is
£20 a tonne. The total revenue from the quota is 30 million multiplied by £20 a
tonne, which equals £600 million.
9c. The importing agents who have been allocated the quota.
1a. A table like Table 36.1 on p. 826 with the numbers provided in the problem.
The current account shows Imports of goods and services 350 billions of grains,
Exports of goods and services, 500 billions of grains, Net interest payments,
unknown, and Net transfers, unknown. You cannot calculate the current account
balance from these numbers because of the two unknown items.
The capital account shows Foreign investment in Silecon, 60 billions of grains,
Silecon investment abroad, -200 billions of grains, and a capital account
balance of 140 billions of grains (a deficit).
The official settlements account shows Increase in official Silecon reserves,
-10 billions of grains (minus because it is an increase).
Because the sum of the three balances is zero, you can now calculate the current
account balance, 150 billions of grains, a surplus. Exports of goods and
services minus imports of goods and services equal 150 billions of grains. So
the sum of Net interest income and Net transfers is zero, but we dont know the
values of these two items separately.
1b. The Silecon central bank intervenes in the foreign exchange market.
We know that the central bank intervenes in the foreign exchange market because
its official reserves changed.
3a. Net exports are 10 million.
Use the fact that
Y = C + I + G + NX and solve for NX as
NX = Y C I G, which equals
NX = 60 36 20 14 = 10.
3b. Saving is 12 million.
Use the fact that
Y = C + S + NT and solve for S as
S = Y C NT, which equals
S = 60 36 12 = 12.
3c. National saving and foreign borrowing finance investment.
I = S + NT G NX, which equals
I = 12 + 12 14 ( 10) = 20.
5a. Imports of goods and services are 26 billion bands.
Use the fact that
Y = C + I + G + X M and solve for M as
M = Y + C + I + G + X, which is
M = 100 + 60 + 22 + 24 + 20 = 26.
5b. The current account balance is 6 billion bands (assuming that net
interest income plus net transfers is zero).
Use the fact that
CAB = X M
CAB = 20 26 = 6.
5c. The capital account balance is unknown.
The sum of the current account, capital account, and official settlements
account is zero. The capital account balance cannot be calculated unless
information is given about the official settlements account.
5d. Net taxes are 20 billion bands.
Use the fact that
Gov. budget deficit = G NT, so
NT = G Gov. budget deficit, which is
NT = 24 4 = 20.
5e. The private sector balance is 2 billion bands (a deficit).
Use the fact that
Private sector surplus = S I, with
S = Y C NT, or
Private sector surplus = Y C NT I, which is
Private sector surplus = 100 60 20 22 = 2.
7a. The country intervenes in the foreign exchange market to limit movements in
the exchange rate.
7b. The central bank might have conducted an open market operation in the bond
market to increase the interest rate.
The Central banks intervention in the foreign exchange market did not bring
appreciation. On the contrary, its intervention limited the extent of the
appreciation.
7c. Private traders in the foreign exchange market might have increased their
demand for the currency perhaps because they expected the exchange rate to
appreciate in the future.